Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Sebastopol votes to oppose county water fluoridation

By MARY CALLAHAN
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

The Sebastopol City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to join the City of Cotati in opposing fluoridation of Sonoma County’s drinking water, even if its own water supply would not be directly affected.

The 5-0 vote came despite a written plea from county Board of Supervisors Chairman David Rabbitt, who asked the council to hold off on its discussion pending the completion of ongoing engineering, financial and wildlife studies related to the fluoridation proposal.

waterStudy findings should be available later this year, along with results from an upcoming survey of local kindergarten and third-graders that may reveal what Rabbitt called “a ‘silent epidemic’ of dental disease.”

“I don’t even know where I stand on the issue right now — I’ve been leaning toward not doing it,” Rabbitt said in an interview Wednesday. But “there’s three major reports that are not complete. Why would you make a decision before you have those?”

The county is considering fluoridation as part of a multi-pronged effort to address an incidence of tooth decay that exceeds the state average, according to a 2009 county survey of local kids.

The 2009 survey found that more than half of Sonoma County third-graders had a history of dental decay, local health officials said. More than 16 percent had untreated decay.

Fluoride, a chemical compound, has been introduced in small amounts into the U.S. drinking supply since 1945 to improve dental health. Three-quarters of Americans on community water systems now get fluoride in their water.

The practice has been backed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Surgeon General, the World Health Organization and the American Dental Association, which called water fluoridation “the single most effective public health measure to prevent dental decay.”

But a growing chorus of skeptics across the country opposes fluoridation as both unnecessary and potentially dangerous. Among the various evidence they cite are warnings, even on toothpaste tubes, that caution against ingesting too much of the product.

The city of Sebastopol has an independent groundwater system and would not be directly affected by fluoridation of drinking water provided by the Sonoma County Water Agency to about 350,000 Sonoma County consumers.

City officials have nonetheless raised concerns about fluoride leaching into local waterways and are opposed to paying for treatment of fluoride-tainted wastewater through their partnership in the regional wastewater treatment system.

Members of the public, including two local dentists, also challenged the efficacy of fluoridated water in fighting tooth decay. They voiced concerns about the potential effects on thyroid function and other health factors, and raised the specter of environmental pollution from wastewater containing fluoride, as often happens with pharmaceuticals that pass through treatment processes.

Councilman Patrick Slayter said Tuesday that divining the truth between competing opinions on fluoride was beyond his ability at present, but said he had a definite issue with the fact that consumers of fluoridated water would have no choice in the matter.

His colleagues on the council agreed.

But Rabbitt said even supervisors haven’t decided the issue yet and are only investigating the idea. He said the board would be sending letters to other communities, as well, urging them to withhold opinions until all the information is in.

The letter, he said, “wasn’t meant to be strong-arming, telling anyone what to do. It was just, ‘Hey, there are other reports that are due.’”

You can reach Staff Writer Mary Callahan at 521-5249 or mary.callahan@pressdemocrat.com.





4 Responses to “Sebastopol votes to oppose county water fluoridation”

  1. Wow, Tin Foil, more dissing of Sebastopol in an attempt to mislead, misinform and misstate the facts.
    “Zero harm”? Gee. I sure don’t know where you came up with THAT misguided conclusion, but let me give you a bit of sage advice: Put some effort into doing the necessary research into the deleterious health, safety and environmental effects which have been associated with hydrofluorosilicic acid -a.k.a. industrial-grade fluoride. (Hint: It’s NOT your grandmother’s dental-grade fluoride.) If, after doing so, you still feel that adding this toxic-waste which is obtained from the phosphate-fertilizer-production industry to our precious Sonoma County water supply is a good, dental-health-enhancing idea, then by all means, please avail yourself of this stuff by contracting with a company which sells and delivers it and have a tanker truck full (with the necessary hazardous-waste skull-and-crossbones insignia affixed to the back) delivered right to your doorstep for personal use. The toxic-waste handlers clad in white suits will, I’m sure, be all too happy to assist you.

    Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4

  2. James Bennett says:

    Why do public officials trying to discredit the truth always default to he ‘tin foil hat’ thing?

    Here’s an award winning documentary largely about Wi-Fi/EMF. Smart Meters and their central role in a technocracy called the Smart Grid:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg01BZ3ICBk

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  3. We have a mission in Dallas, Texas to Halt the addition of Fluoride in our water supply!! We spoke to the Dallas City Council on February 5th! GREAT you prevailed in your area!! We are looking forward to be announcing we prevailed here!!I will share your story around here!!!

    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 4

  4. Tin Foil Hats says:

    Wow…next thing you know they’ll be banning wifi….which has just as much evidence of causing harm…zero.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 12

Leave a Reply