Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Santa Rosa renews deal with labor negotiator

By KEVIN McCALLUM
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Santa Rosa rehired its labor negotiator Tuesday despite questions raised by two council members about the cost of the firm’s services and the soundness of its guidance.

The council voted 5-2 to extend the contract for Burke, Williams & Sorensen, over the objections of councilmembers Gary Wysocky and Julie Combs

Both expressed concern with the cost of services of M. Carol Stevens, a partner in the firm, particularly over the negotiation of the latest labor contract for firefighters.

Wysocky said that Stevens presented “inaccurate and untimely” information to the council during closed-session discussions about the firefighters’ contract, a three-year deal the council approved in October.

Wysocky sought to lift the confidentiality covering the limited portion of those discussions relating to the information provided to the council, but on a 4-3 vote his colleagues declined.

Vice Mayor Robin Swinth, who voted against lifting confidentiality, noted that the city was in the middle of negotiations with other groups and releasing such information now wasn’t sound negotiating strategy.

After the meeting, Wysocky said the inaccurate information presented to the council was directly relevant to the deliberations of the council on the contract. But he declined to detail the information, citing his colleagues’ decision not to release it.

He instead focused on the cost of Stevens’ service, which he noted cost the city $300 per hour. He noted that on one day alone Stevens billed the city for 12 hours of work.

“We have some hard working attorneys,” said Risk Manager Lynn Margolies.

“For $300 an hour I’d work that hard too!” Wysocky replied.

It is standard for such consultants to be paid their hourly rate during travel time, and it was pointed out that Stevens, whose office is in Mountain View, likely billed for travel time on the day in question.

The city already has spent about $100,000 with the firm, and the new contract authorized $150,000 more.

The additional work is needed in part because two city labor units, Santa Rosa City Attorneys and the Santa Rosa City Employees Association, the largest in the city, have declared impasse and called for the city to go through factfinding, a new and potentially complex process with which the city has no experience.

Nevertheless, Combs said she was disappointed the city did not explore other firms that might be capable of the doing the work. She said Stevens “did some surprising things” during presentations to the council and “made some statements that were questionable.”

But Mayor Scott Bartley said he was satisfied with the work of the firm.

“I think we’re doing more damage to ourselves with this kind of discussion,” he said.

You can reach Staff Writer Kevin McCallum at 521-5207 or kevin.mccallum@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @citybeater.





4 Responses to “Santa Rosa renews deal with labor negotiator”

  1. brown act jack says:

    What! Stop a city from contracting out work to the private sector?

    How else could a city employee help an outside attorney other than giving them a contract for work the city attorney could do!

    Oh, the city attorney does not know how to do this legal work?

    LOL

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

  2. Barbara says:

    Ever ask yourself why the rabbits at city hall never seem to be directly involved at the table with the city unions? The city always hires, hired guns to do the nasty business of dealing with the public sector unions.

    The answer is because it will lead to a short career with the city. The unions will cry that they are being treated unfairly by ogre sitting across from them and the city council, city attorney and city manager will blame the city employee negotiator for not not understanding what the needs and wants of the unions might be.

    Remember, the unions support, endorse and spend money on the city council members they elect to be their bosses. So it is a can of worms.

    Unions have no real place in public employment. They are not defending the employees, they are collecting their dues and electing the politicians who enact what they unions want to benefit the unions.

    Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4

  3. Big Jim says:

    $300 per hour to drive from Mountainview to Santa Rosa? So we are wasting $600 for someone to commute to work? I guess the city has more mone than it knows how to spend wisely, but lets keep approving tax increases.

    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0

  4. steve humphrey says:

    Just one more reason why Public Employees shouldn’t be allowed to unionize.

    Thumb up 16 Thumb down 6

Leave a Reply