WatchSonoma Watch

Price jump for new Roseland park alarms Santa Rosa City Council


Cost overruns at a planned park in Santa Rosa’s Roseland neighborhood are the latest in a steady stream of problems facing the city’s Recreation and Parks Department.

The consulting firm hired to design Bayer Neighborhood Park and Garden on West Avenue says it needs an additional $320,000 and two more years to complete work on the long-delayed project.

Bayer Farm (PD FILE, 2009)

Bayer Farm (PD FILE, 2009)

The increase would bring the total cost of community outreach and design services to $1.35 million, a figure that surprised several City Council members when they heard it earlier this month.

Mayor Scott Bartley calculated the new cost as 21 percent of the $6.5 million estimated cost to construct the park, “which by any stretch of the imagination is exorbitant.”

Councilman Gary Wysocky also balked at the higher figure, stressing how many other needs there are in the cash-strapped department.

“This is a 30 percent change order, is what this is,” Wysocky said. “Wow!”

Assistant City Manager Jennifer Phillips explained that the costs increased because the scope of the project expanded significantly once the community got involved in helping design the park.

Originally, the park was envisioned to rehabilitate the old farmhouse and barn on the property. But over the course of “20 or 30 meetings” with the community, numerous other features were added, including a community building, commercial kitchen, offices for LandPaths and a caretaker’s residence.

“It was a wonderful collaborative effort from a community engagement standpoint, but I think from a project management standpoint, we missed on a few marks,” Phillips said.

The cost of the project – including acquisition of the land — soared to nearly $20 million, money the city doesn’t have, she said.

“Basically what happened is we told the public money is no object through the design process,” Bartley said.

The project has since been scaled back significantly to something closer to what the city can afford. Much of the project cost is being funded through grants.

But all those changes came at a price. The largest additional costs were for the architectural and engineering drawings for structures that were never envisioned when the original agreement was struck with the Mill Valley firm, Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abbey.

Other unanticipated costs include wetland and endangered species permits, a traffic study, environmental assessment of the old farmhouse, and payments to LandPaths for community outreach.

The City Council asked Phillips to return Tuesday with additional documentation showing how the costs got, as Bartley put it, “way out of hand.”

Bartley said he suspects what happened is the project suffered from “scope creep.” He predicted the council will ultimately approve higher costs because it wants to see the park constructed. But he said he needs the documentation to better understand what went wrong.

“There’s just a lot of stuff I need to see before I can say ‘OK we made a mistake and I’m ready to move forward,’” he said.

Councilwoman Robin Swinth said she was troubled by the steady stream of problems facing the Recreation and Parks Department.

“We see issue after issue come up that shows that we need either more oversight or we need a plan,” Swinth said.

Within the past year, the department’s top two officials retired after it was revealed they had accepted thousands of dollars of free golf from the operator of the Bennett Valley Golf Course. The course itself also was shown to be bleeding money.

It was also revealed that two homes on a future park site were leased out for $100 and $200 per month each, one to a city employee. And the irrigation budget was found to be short by $200,000, which didn’t do the grass in parks any favors over the dry summer.

City Manager Kathy Millison explained that Phillips, who served for several months as the interim department head, has been the point person on the “large volume of corrective actions” the department has needed.

But she noted a new director is on board and a long-range strategy for tackling the issues facing the department is in the works.

You can reach Staff Writer Kevin McCallum at 521-5207 or kevin.mccallum@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @citybeater

7 Responses to “Price jump for new Roseland park alarms Santa Rosa City Council”

  1. Jim says:

    Building a park in Roseland is basically building a place for drug dealers and gang bangers to hang out.

    And before you click that red ‘thumbs down’, why don’t you move into Roseland for a couple years. Unless you’ve lived there you shouldn’t comment. I lived in Roseland and saw the gang bangers, saw the drug dealing, saw the graffiti, saw the territorial fights…The whole area is a crime ridden disaster.

    Put your money where your mouth is, or don’t comment.

  2. Papa ESoCo says:

    Gave you a thumbs up because I totally agree with your argument. The whole SW has been ignored and shunted aside for at least 60 years. That said, have to add, like all the rest of SR’s Parks; it will be neglected and allowed to turn into a weed patch. All the while, The Movers and shakers of the Parks Dept. will continue to feed off the fat.

  3. bear says:

    Why would we want to provide these people with a park equal in quality to those in other parts of the city? After all, it would just serve as a gathering point for these people and a site for crime.

    Wrong. It would correct 60 years of discrimination by both the City and the County. The plan for the park has been on the books since at least 1978.

  4. Reality Check says:

    Is anyone surprised here? I guess so. You ask a community what they’d like to see in a park and, surprise, the list gets long and costs skyrocket. Did anyone from the city communicate that they had a budget within which to live?

    Heads need to roll.

  5. The Hammer says:

    $20 million for this park! What hell is wrong with these people. Let’s fix the roads.

  6. Paulo says:

    What is needed is another “Peoples Park” with lots of tall trees in it so protesters can sit in the trees for months protesting anything they think needs protesting.

    Its an idea whose time as come and fits right in with the mentality of socialist Sonoma County.

    Another beautiful monument to environmentalism, socialism and all of the wrongs in society.

  7. James Bennett says:

    Yeah, wouldn’t ‘wanna be fiscally irresponsible.

    Playin’ us like a plastic piano.