Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Supervisor Efren Carrillo to appear in court Friday

By PAUL PAYNE & BRETT WILKISON
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Nearly three months after he was arrested in the pre-dawn darkness outside a Santa Rosa woman’s home, Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo returns to court Friday to see whether he will be charged with a crime.

The two-term supervisor, who was booked on suspicion of prowling and burglary after the July incident, faces removal from office if convicted of a felony.

Embattled Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo, listens to Karen Fraser as she asks Carrillo to step down from his position on the board during public comment, Tuesday Sept. 10, 2013 in Santa Rosa. (Kent Porter / Press Democrat)

Embattled Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo, listens to Karen Fraser as she asks Carrillo to step down from his position on the board during public comment, Tuesday Sept. 10, 2013 in Santa Rosa. (Kent Porter / Press Democrat)

Police at the time said they suspected him of attempting a sexual assault, pointing to a torn screen on the woman’s bedroom window.

But prosecutors so far have not filed formal allegations. At a hearing in August, a special prosecutor assigned to the case asked for six additional weeks to decide on charges.

Prosecutor Cody Hunt on Wednesday did not rule out the possibility of another delay.

“I’m not sure what will happen,” Hunt said.

Carrillo’s lawyer, Chris Andrian, said he has not been informed about any pending charges. He said prosecutors had promised to give advance notice of any allegations at least a day before the next hearing.

Carrillo, 32, an up-and-comer in state Democratic politics, was arrested July 13 after a woman called 911 at about 3:40 a.m. to report someone outside her home near Stony Point Road and West Third Street.

She said someone tried to get in her window and she was awaked by the sound of window blinds being moved. In a second 911 call 10 minutes later, she said the person knocked on her door, identified himself as a neighbor and ran away.

Officers arrived and found a torn window screen. Carrillo was in the area, clad in socks and underwear and carrying a cell phone. He was arrested when he could not offer a clear explanation for his behavior.

Carrillo, whom officers said appeared to have been drinking at the time of his arrest, posted bail within hours and reportedly checked into an alcohol treatment facility. He remained in seclusion for five weeks.

He returned to the Board of Supervisors Aug. 20. He apologized and described a longtime problem with binge drinking.

It was his second arrest in less than a year. Last year, he was arrested Labor Day weekend in a fight outside a San Diego nightclub. Local authorities did not press charges.

After the supervisor’s July arrest, Sonoma County District Attorney Jill Ravitch declared a conflict of interest and asked the state Attorney General to step in. The Board of Supervisors has authority over the district attorney’s budget. Ravitch also has been a political supporter of Carrillo.

Hunt, a Napa County deputy district attorney, was assigned to the case under a statewide protocol for dealing with conflicts. He said Wednesday he was waiting to hear from the Attorney General’s Office about a final decision on charges.

A spokeswoman for the attorney general did not return calls Wednesday.

The legal proceeding comes as Carrillo continues daily outpatient treatment for alcohol abuse and as he takes steps to further expand his involvement at public events. In recent weeks he has made several public appearances, including at a fundraiser for the Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation and a Habitat for Humanity groundbreaking.

It also comes as Carrillo’s sharpest critics, including those pressing to remove him from office, await a decision before taking formal steps toward trying to oust him.

Leaders in organized labor who could provide the strongest financial and political backing for a recall effort, said their members agreed it was best to decide on a course of action after Friday.

“Everyone wanted to wait and see what, if any, charges might be levied against Supervisor Carrillo,” said Jack Buckhorn, president of the North Bay Labor Council, the region’s largest coalition of organized labor unions and associations.

The council already has called on Carrillo to resign, accusing him of “a pattern of poor choices and bad behavior.” Buckhorn acknowledged the group’s decision could be complicated if Carrillo is charged with a misdemeanor or if no charges are filed.

Liberal Democratic Party activists meanwhile, said the outcome of Friday’s proceeding, while significant for the alleged victim, Carrillo and the public, would not be a linchpin in their plans to unseat the supervisor.

“We’ve never said that it (the recall) hinges on the arraignment or outcome of any legal proceeding,” said Sebastopol resident Alice Chan, co-chairwoman of the Coalition for Grassroots Progress.

The Sonoma County Democratic Party has not discussed the issue since it weighed in two months ago, saying Carrillo, once a rising star in the state party, should explain himself or resign.

“Most members of the Central Committee are interested to see what takes place in the legal process and at the Board of Supervisors,” said Stephen Gale, the party chairman. Some members of committee also are watching to see if there will be some legal civil action from the woman who reported the incident, he said.

(You can reach Staff Writer Paul Payne at 568-5312 or paul.payne@pressdemocrat.com and Staff Writer Brett Wilkison at 521-5295 or brett.wilkison@pressdemocrat.com.)





7 Responses to “Supervisor Efren Carrillo to appear in court Friday”

  1. Big Fish says:

    @ Captain Underpants….the resounding silence from the elite liberal left should not surprise you. This failure to rally around their victimized sister simply demonstrates their hypocrisy. However a few independent liberal voices have spoken out. They only march lockstep when the perpetrator is white so it will get larger headlines and fit into their mission.

    I agree he should resign but he won’t. I would also hope some of the others would resign too! I think no serious charges will be filed because the state does not have a strong case and would lose. He may get a slap on the hand for his poorly perceived public alcoholic actions.

    Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2

  2. Captain Underpants says:

    The “groups”(Women, Gay, Church, Save the Salamander Etc.) that ‘protect’ us in this county should be ashamed of themselves! You have lost all creditability after this one. You fight everything and are pissed about other things that just should not matter! NOT ONE WORD ABOUT CAPT UNDERPANTS! Your kidding me.
    How do you do that? How is it ok to be dumb if you are a liberal soldier but if that person in their underwear at 3am was from the GOP…WOW
    Please in the future just keep quite, because we now know how you operate.

    Thumb up 23 Thumb down 5

  3. Emerson Burkett says:

    Well, knew it all along; “Captain Underpants” gets a wrist-slap and told to “behave yourself”. If that were you or I we would still be rotting in Jail! Had this fantasy: Efren gets caught in Maricopa County, Arizona, which results in; pink underwear, two piece suit with large black and white stripes and working on the chain-gang from day one. Ah, but this is Sonoma County, where we protect our Politicos. Not that I condone “Sheriff Joe”, quite the contrary.

    Thumb up 25 Thumb down 2

  4. It’s time he stepped down, but he obviously won’t on his own. Still, keep signing the petition….keep the pressure on:

    http://www.change.org/petitions/supervisor-efren-carrillo-please-resign-now

    Thumb up 40 Thumb down 4

  5. Tired of It says:

    Business as usual, Carrillo walks and the voters and those who care about this county go on suffering with this nincompoop.

    If this were Joe nobody, he would have been charged, found guilty and gone to jail by now.

    Thumb up 42 Thumb down 5

  6. Gambling with public nuisances says:

    Carrillo will get no felony charges. Wanna take bets at the new RP casino?

    His handlers and sponsors, including Doug Bosco and Eric Konigshoffer have no doubt called Gov. Jerry Brown (beneficiary of their huge fundraising powers), who has called Kamela Harris, who will call the Napa DA Hunt, who is “waiting to hear from the Attorney General’s Office about a final decision on charges” and tell him to lay low, and only issue misdemeanor charges.

    Then Efren will proclaim his innocence, no case records or recordings will be released by Santa Rosa PD, and Efren will continue his merry way until the next screw up.

    Keep your pants on, Efren, we’ll be watching, ugly as it is. Do us all a favor, and just resign.

    Thumb up 57 Thumb down 7

  7. observer says:

    The DA in a just county would be an instrument of impartial justice. Including this: enabling due process; letting the court system decide the Supervisor’s guilt or innocence.

    But justice in Sonoma County is for friends of the insiders. By publicly denouncing the Supervisor before his due process unfolds, our DA has joined the Grand Jury and its Presiding Judge as instruments of insider justice; and retribution and injustice for everybody else.

    Thumb up 32 Thumb down 14

Leave a Reply