Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Petaluma City Council postpones vote on proposed luxury apartment complex

By LORI A. CARTER
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Developers of a proposed high-end apartment complex in east Petaluma will need to reconsider their plans if they want approval from the City Council.

After a hearing that lasted past midnight Monday, it appeared there weren’t four votes needed to approve San Francisco developer JDA West’s planned 144-unit complex at 35 Maria Dr., southeast of the Washington Square shopping center off South McDowell Boulevard.

Mayor David Glass, Councilmen Mike Healy and Chris Albertson and Councilwoman Teresa Barrett expressed concerns over the density and design of the project.

Councilwoman Kathy Miller and Councilmen Mike Harris and Gabe Kearney supported the project, saying it fills an important housing need, given the city’s 2 percent rental vacancy rate.

Ultimately, the hearing was put on hold to allow developers time to determine whether a they wanted to return with a redesigned project that satisfy the council’s concerns and be financially viable for them.

In August, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a general plan amendment and a zoning change to allow the complex, billed as a luxury development where 1,000-square-foot units would rent for $2,000 a month.

A group of neighbors urged the city to reconsider, saying the density of the three-story complex is incompatible with their neighborhood of single-family homes.

Neighbors also objected to what they believe will be excessive traffic, noise and a lack of privacy with a nearby apartment complex. The parcel currently has a half-empty office complex on it.

“It’s inappropriate for this street in this area,” said neighborhood leader Kathleen Garvey.

“Our neighborhood is going to be probably destroyed,” said Stanley Dettner, who said he has lived in the area for 44 years.

But city planners noted that the proposed complex is less intensive than what current zoning allows on the nearly 6-acre parcel.

It is zoned mixed-use, which would allow for a retail shopping center and as many as 176 residential units.

JDA West spokesman Marty Brill said current codes would allow for 637,000 square feet of development and 30 units of housing per acre. His company is proposing 147,000 square feet and density of 25 units an acre.

“The property today is struggling both physically and operationally,” he said. “We view this as a great opportunity to improve an underutilized site in an area that could use some improvement.”

Glass said 18 units per acre would be more appropriate. Miller and Harris both noted that this project is far smaller than what could be built.

Healy said he is more concerned with an uninspired design than the density issue. He said he wants to see something that truly “reads luxury” apartments — not just granite kitchen counters and stainless steel appliances.

Planners recommended approving the zoning change, noting that the city needs more apartments, not office space.

A study done for the project shows Petaluma has about a 2 percent vacancy for apartments. In comparison, office vacancies are at about 25 percent.

Brill said early in the meeting that anything less than 144 units wasn’t viable. Afterward, he declined to say whether the company will return with a redesigned proposal.

Staff Writer Lori Carter can be reached at 762-7297 or lori.carter@pressdemocrat.com.





7 Responses to “Petaluma City Council postpones vote on proposed luxury apartment complex”

  1. James Bennett says:

    Smart Growth usually has a high vacancy rate.

    The idea isn’t for folks to actually live there by choice.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  2. James Bennett says:

    Smart Growth has high vacancy rate.

    People generally don’t like it.

    Insider developers build because they are tax exempt for for many years.
    They’re held harmless regarding build quality. They are often even tax payer subsidized!

    TPTB are hoping that once their Agenda is realized, and folks can’t afford rural/country/suburban life, that it will be the hottest real estate in town.
    Very condensed, crowded little ‘Islands of Human Habitation’. ‘Transit Oriented Housing’.

    Oppression is never about choice.

    That’s why they keep building it, and have concrete resolve to build more.

    It’s to replace our American Dream, with globalists American Dream.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. BigDogatPlay says:

    I am a little skeptical of the 2% vacancy rate in apartments that the developer quoted. There are vacant units all over town, if the signs I see here and there are any indication. And if this is the office park directly behind Safeway, had anyone noticed the couple of hundred units of apartments right across the street currently being remodelled to be slightly more upscale? The neighbors come off like NIMBYs.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  4. earthsleaves says:

    New apartmens on Petaluma Blvd. jsut past the police station – empty

    new apartments on McDowell empty

    apartments on Lakeville – all up and down Lakeville – not full

    Basin Street apartments – not full

    one of the city council members on Monday night said Petaluma needed more apartments because “our goal i more job” – huh? – – are you planning to blight this community with industrial type businesses?

    It is taking a few square miles of town and pretending it is Marin or Santa Rosa.

    A planning commission full of developers/pro-development

    Gridlock everywhere – more to come if this self-serving attitude continues.

    At least the mayor of this town reads and sees

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4

  5. James Bennett says:

    The illusion of legitimate process.

    And.

    A new name for Smart Growth…

    ‘luxury apartment complex’.

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1

  6. Elephant says:

    Typical Petaluma Council – did you actually read the article?

    Petaluma needs one thing and one thing ONLY built there. Affordable housing. $2,000 a month for 1,000 square feet is absolutely NOT affordable housing. Unless you’re in one of the high rent areas of San Francisco, that is.

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 8

  7. Typical Petaluma Council says:

    Of course the Petaluma City Council voted this down. Housing is desperately needed and this is a perfect place (an almost abandoned 30 year old office complex. I get that Glass and Barrett vote against building anything but now it looks like Albertson has bumped his head as well. Typical Petaluma.

    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3

Leave a Reply