WatchSonoma Watch

Democrats stop short of immediate demand for Efren Carrillo’s resignation


Political support for embattled Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo crumbled further this week as the Sonoma County Democratic Party said Carrillo should resign if the recent criminal allegations facing him turn out to be accurate.

The party said Carrillo’s July 13 arrest raised “grave concerns” for the alleged victim — a female neighbor who made two predawn 911 calls to report a man, later identified as Carrillo, who police said tried to enter her home through a bedroom window.

Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo leaves Sonoma County Superior Court after his first appearance on Thursday, July 18, 2013. (Conner Jay / The Press Democrat)

Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo leaves Sonoma County Superior Court after his first appearance on Thursday, July 18, 2013. (Conner Jay / The Press Democrat)

In a written statement Wednesday, the county’s Democratic Party stopped short of calling for Carrillo’s immediate resignation, but said the 32-year-old supervisor must explain himself, starting with his court case.

“Efren Carrillo is entitled to present his defense in a court of law,” the party’s statement said. “However, if the details of this case have thus far been portrayed accurately, we believe that Supervisor Carrillo’s behavior fails to meet the standard of conduct we expect from our elected officials, and he should resign.”

The carefully worded three-paragraph statement was approved Tuesday night in a meeting of the party’s central committee. It represents the local party’s first official reaction to Carrillo’s arrest last month on suspicion of burglary, a felony, and prowling, a misdemeanor.

For Carrillo, a Democrat, and until recently a rising Latino star in the state party, it is the latest blow to his political standing and any bid to remain in elected office.

On July 30, his four fellow county supervisors condemned in a public meeting the conduct that led to his recent arrest.

The following day, two influential labor coalitions called on Carrillo to resign, saying he had displayed “a pattern of poor choices and bad behavior” that have brought “shame and discredit” on the county.

July’s arrest was the second in 10 months for Carrillo, who was wearing only underwear and socks when police encountered him near his home. On Labor Day weekend in 2012, he was arrested in connection with a bar fight in downtown San Diego, though charges in that case were ultimately dropped.

The comments by Carrillo’s colleagues and by groups that have supported and donated to his campaigns may carry the most weight.

The reaction by the Sonoma County Democratic Party likely is more symbolic, an assessment that Stephen Gale, the party chairman, acknowledged. The party endorsed Carrillo’s opponent in his first successful run for county office in 2008 and did not endorse a candidate in his run for re-election last year.

“Being realistic, I don’t expect that Carrillo will read our statement and that he will resign,” Gale said. “If he chooses to resign, I think he’ll resign for his own reasons, and those will be based on reaction from the public and his constituents and those who would be voting for him in future.”

Gale said the party would be looking to the legal process and Carrillo’s own statements about his arrest to determine whether or not a full-throated call for resignation would be made.

“The threshold is really not a legal standard. It’s a standard of conduct,” Gale said. “We’re extremely concerned based on the information that’s available so far.”

Some central committee members said they felt the party needed to stake out a position sooner rather than later.

“I think it was important to stand with the woman involved and say that if this is accurate, he should resign,” said Julie Combs, a Santa Rosa councilwoman who serves as an alternate on the central committee and who participated in the meeting.

“We can’t go further than that right now because it’s a big ‘if,’” Combs added. “Efren has a right to due process. He has a right to state his side.”

Other party leaders said the statement was premature.

“It’s important to show restraint and not rush to judgment at such an early stage in the process,” said Eric Koenigshofer, a former county supervisor, central committee member and political adviser to Carrillo. “Nobody really knows what happened yet.”

Carrillo is next due in court Aug. 30 to learn what charges, if any, prosecutors will file.

Gale defended the way the statement was carefully crafted, a reflection, he said, of the twin arguments that dominated the central committee’s roughly two-hour, closed-door discussion about Carrillo’s situation. He described the meeting as well-attended and “somber.”

“I didn’t have the sense that anyone took pleasure in the discussion we were having to have,” he said.

The conversation focused on Carrillo’s alleged behavior, whether the party should make a statement and what that statement should be, Gale said.

“There was a strong sense, based on what we know, that the supervisor should resign,” he said. “And there was an equally strong sense that we may not know everything.”

The committee ultimately voted 17 to 3 in favor of the statement released Wednesday. Gale said supporters and opponents of Carrillo were on both sides of the vote. He and other committee members refused to provide additional details on the roll-call vote, citing party rules for closed-door meetings.

Five members who abstained from the vote are alternates for state and federal elected officials whose districts include the county. A source who participated in the meeting described their sideline stance as somewhat routine.

Before the meeting, the committee received about a dozen letters from individuals and organizations, Gale said. Most called for Carrillo’s immediate resignation, including one from the Sonoma County Latino Democratic Club, Gale said.

The Latino club is set to take up the issue itself next week, Gale said.

You can reach Staff Writer Brett Wilkison at 521-5295 or brett.wilkison@pressdemocrat.com.

12 Responses to “Democrats stop short of immediate demand for Efren Carrillo’s resignation”

  1. Big jim says:

    Shame on Democrat cowards who can’t see past political expediency to recognize that when someone is prowling the street in their underwear in the early morning, they are unfit to serve as our government representatives. Where are your backbones? By not condeming this behavior, you condone it, and it has nothing to do with waiting for the criminal proceedings that would paint this in a much darker light.

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

  2. http://www.change.org/petitions/supervisor-efren-carrillo-please-resign-now

    Please visit the link above and sign the petition, asking Carrillo to resign now – 385 have signed so far.

    We, the undersigned, seek to restore respect and dignity to the Board of Supervisors and the 5th Supervisorial District of Sonoma County. It is imperative that Supervisor Efren Carrillo, having been arrested twice in less than a year, resign from office immediately.

    His most recent arrest demonstrates that Mr. Carrillo cannot avoid legal trouble. We therefore ask that he no longer represent the 5th District as a member of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors. We strongly believe he is incapable of governing and should instead focus on resolving his personal issues.

    For the future of Sonoma County and the office he currently holds, we ask that he do the honorable thing at this time and resign from public office.

    Efren Carrillo, Supervisor, 5th District, Sonoma County
    Please resign now so that you may focus on resolving your personal issues – without compromising the integrity of the office of Supervisor for the 5th District of Sonoma County.
    [Your name]


    Thumb up 23 Thumb down 4

  3. Henry Bernard says:

    “We can’t go further than that right now because it’s a big ‘if,’” Combs added. “Efren has a right to due process. He has a right to state his side.”

    Yes, Ms. Combs, you can go further. You’ve misaligned judicial due process with political obligation, Ms. Combs. Mr. Carrillo has the right to due process relative the potential criminal indictment that hangs over his bowed head. As for his responsibility to his constituency, he has no ‘right’, but rather he has been awarded privilege to serve, a privilege for which he apparently wasn’t prepared to shoulder.

    That he serves obligates the man to explain himself, regardless his personal problems, as any employee would be required to do once confronted by an employer for behavior unbecoming. Unbecoming not only for a Supervisor, but also a man, if this properly defines him given his puerile behavior. We hired Mr. Carrillo to solve problems, not create them. Now, he is a problem, one we neither deserve, nor should feel any compunction to support.

    Thumb up 26 Thumb down 6

  4. MOCKINGBIRD says:

    Grapevines-Monica was fully participating in all that happened. Some woman are like that. And we progressives still support Clinton. IN FACT-I’m hoping Hillary and Elizabeth run for the Presidency and VP in 2016 and you can bet I’ll be working hard for both of them. In point of fact too, Weiner’s and Spitzer’s “contacts” were consenting too too. You must miss the word consenting.

    Time for the women to take the reigns.

    And Carrillo is a Democrat only in name. As far as this progressive is concerned I didn’t support him the first time when he WOULDN’T answer direct questions and I didn’t support him last time because of the same thing and he didn’t again answer questions. I’d like to see him resign so we can get someone who isn’t solely for big business in this county on BOS-another voice to Sonoma County families is needed.

    Thumb up 17 Thumb down 6

  5. Skippy says:

    Carillo, Filner, Weiner, Spitzer, Clinton, Kennedy.
    The Democrat War On Women continues….

    Thumb up 27 Thumb down 9

  6. Cedric Pigg says:

    Someone on another thread named Efren “Captain Underpants”. I hope it sticks.

    Thumb up 37 Thumb down 3

  7. Grapevines says:

    You didn’t really expect the Democrats to come right out and oust him now did you? Remember, they had the “Molester-in-Chief” in Bill Clinton and they also supported him.

    Smoke and mirrors is all your going to see here. Move along, move along.

    Thumb up 22 Thumb down 10

  8. Emerson Burkett says:

    Can you hear the drumbeat? The drumbeat that is going to “drum” you out of office? Even the Democrats (who, apparently never supported you anyway) are calling for you to step down; please do something honorable(for a change), and resign immediately. I really do not think that Eric and Dougie boy are going to be able to Spin you out of this mess. Also, it just is not right for you to hold out until January, just to get a Pension; you have already fed too long at the “Public Trough”.

    Thumb up 33 Thumb down 3

  9. bear says:

    I still want to know how any guy of any age – and however blasted – comes to be running around the neighborhood in his underwear?

    Then he should resign.

    Thumb up 42 Thumb down 3

  10. Perplexed says:

    It is interesting how Eric Koenigshofer continues to stall and defend the situation.

    It reflects poorly on him, his committee, and the rest of his party. I hope we remember his odd affiliation in the future. Weird?

    Thumb up 43 Thumb down 4

  11. Elephant says:

    And shame on those like Koenigshofer for waffling and spinning. Carrillo is causing more and more damage the longer this plays out. The sooner he resigns, the better it will be for all.

    Thumb up 42 Thumb down 5

  12. GAJ says:

    Congratulations to the Democrats who have come out and stated clearly that this failure should resign.

    Thumb up 46 Thumb down 4

Leave a Reply