Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Healdsburg wrestling with pot-growing guidelines

By CLARK MASON
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

In the heart of Wine Country, where harvest time produces pungent scents of fermenting grapes, the conversation these days is about another odor — that of skunk-like budding marijuana plants.

The harvest is still months away, but wine-centric Healdsburg is wrestling with guidelines for medical marijuana cultivation and whether to confine it indoors.

The intent behind keeping cultivation indoors is not only to suppress the smell, but to discourage burglaries and even violence.

potHealdsburg would become the second city in Sonoma County behind Sebastopol to set rules for growing medical marijuana. But differences between the two towns and their divergent views toward pot was part of the sometimes impassioned discussion at last week’s Healdsburg City Council meeting.

“In Sebastopol, they don’t complain about the smell and in Healdsburg they do. And I’m not sure why,” said Healdsburg Police Chief Kevin Burke.

Is it because of liberal, west county politics where Green Party candidates get more votes, the entire city of Sebastopol is designated a non-nuclear zone, and the top vote-getter in the last City Council election, Robert Jacob, was someone who operates a medical marijuana dispensary?

“Obviously there is a level of comfort here with medical marijuana that resulted in the electoral result,” Sebastopol Police Chief Jeff Weaver said Thursday.

But he said there could be various reasons for the few complaints or problems associated with marijuana growing in Sebastopol, which allows up to 30 plants in gardens that can cover as much as 100 square feet.

“I don’t know if people aren’t growing as much, or maybe they’re more discreet about it, or maybe people are more tolerant about it,” Weaver said.

In response to perennial complaints about backyard marijuana gardens in Healdsburg, Police Chief Burke proposed guidelines that would allow only indoor cultivation, with grow lights. Patients could have up to 12 mature plants and 24 immature ones.

Although California voters approved the use of medical marijuana in 1996, no standards were set on the numbers of plants or the amount of marijuana patients could possess and it has remained a murky issue.

The state, cities and counties have come up with different limits. But the state Supreme Court in 2010 in essence said the limits can be exceeded and patients can possess and cultivate as much as is “reasonably necessary” for their medical needs.

The Healdsburg Planning Commission unanimously endorsed the proposed cultivation ordinance, adding an air filter requirement in the home to keep the telltale plant odor from being detected by neighborhood children, or others tempted to steal the crop.

But after the proposal received publicity, marijuana advocates showed up in force at Monday’s City Council public hearing to express their objections.

Some of those critical of Healdsburg’s plans to prohibit outdoor gardens, or urging the City Council to study the issue further, included Sebastopol vice-mayor Jacob, executive director of the Peace in Medicine cannabis dispensary; former Sebastopol City Council members Craig Litwin and Linda Kelley; and former West County Supervisor Ernie Carpenter.

Many speakers urged Healdsburg officials to pass more liberal guidelines like those in Sebastopol and unincorporated parts of Sonoma County.

Jacob noted that his dispensaries have 36,750 registered patients in Sonoma County and 1,147 of them in the past five years have been from Healdsburg, which prohibits dispensaries, like most cities in the county.

But Healdsburg Councilman Shaun McCaffery said Healdsburg is different from Sebastopol and needs to craft its own ordinance. “People think differently in these two towns,” he said.

With a slight hint of sarcasm, Healdsburg Councilman Gary Plass said he wanted to “thank all the speakers and everybody who gave their time to drive all the way from Sebastopol.”

Plass added that the city was not trying to limit people who need medical marijuana, but was talking about putting the plants indoors to avoid the odor issue.

But being forced to grow indoors is a significant expense, especially for low-income patients who need it, according to critics.

“It forces people to pay for sunlight indoors, instead of using it for free outdoors,” said former Sebastopol City Councilman Litwin.

“Why are people complaining about the smell?” said Martin Lee, a medical marijuana patient who lives in winery-studded Dry Creek Valley.

“I live near a winery. When it’s harvest time, you smell the vinegar everywhere. I find that a lot more obnoxious than the smell of a marijuana plant,” he said, arguing that the plant has medicinal terpenes that some people find pleasant. He said it only gives off an aroma as it begins to bud around mid-August, heading toward the fall harvest.

Lee, who has written a book on the social history of cannabis, said there is still a lot of prejudice, a “bigotry about the evil weed.”

“People have been taught to hate marijuana and to fear it,” he said.

But Joe Lickey, a Healdsburg resident, said he neither hates marijuana nor is afraid of it. He said his 6-year-old child did not want to play outside of their Prince Street home because of the smell from a neighbor’s pot plants.

Lickey said people who need it should be able to get it at little or no cost. But he expressed objections to those who bend the rules to become medical marijuana patients, grow it in the backyard for profit, and attract thieves to steal it.

After more than 90 minutes of discussion, Healdsburg City Council members decided they needed more information and agreed to form a task force to come up with recommendations.

The tentative timeline is to come back to the City Council in late September or October, coincidentally just about the time of harvest.

You can reach Staff Writer Clark Mason at 521-5214 or clark.mason@pressdemocrat.com.





11 Responses to “Healdsburg wrestling with pot-growing guidelines”

  1. Steveguy says:

    Tax pot ? OK then let’s tax oxycodone, oxycontin, Norco and Vicodin.

    Never happen, as they are the drugs the ‘upper ruling’ class takes. ( And kills up to 100,000 a year, versus zero for pot ).

    It’s a weed

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

  2. Snarky says:

    Kathy Robler works for government.

    So she supports TAXING pot… as if anyone should have to pay a tax on a naturally growing plant.

    Thats why some call it “weed” Kathy.

    Bottom line: Government doesn’t deserve taxes on pot. That would be pure extortion as the government does absolutely nothing regarding pot except use it as a tool to steal money for their public pensions.

    Personally, I would suggest to anyone who does vote in favor of pot … because that vote is increasingly in favor of pot every election cycle… vote NO to taxes on pot.

    Legalize it yes. Tax it, NO.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2

  3. Kathy Robler says:

    Unregulated, untaxed and really controlled by the Mexican drug cartels, marijuana is just another joke on the public that a hippie drug is good for everybody including the politicians who ponder these things.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 7

  4. SeanyBoy says:

    Charcoal filter in a greenhouse
    Special permission for actually disabled people
    Specific cannabiss strains that don’t smell as much or even very much

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

  5. SeanyBoy says:

    Both sides provide a legitamite argument .
    Danger
    Civil liberty
    How about a greenhouse with a constant passive outtake threw a charcoal filter , a couple of hundred watts Max ,
    & you could lock the green house .

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  6. Snarky says:

    Pot laws help fund the “public safety” machine. We all know that.

    Without pot laws, we have nothing but excess public employees in every court room, in every police dept, in every prosecutors office.

    Eliminate pot laws and you cut governmental operational cost but you also must lay off all the totally excess, un-necssary public employees… and thats the dirty secret that government refuses to acknowledge.

    Pardon me while I go off board… the IRS is at my door and the NSA just sent me a threatening email.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  7. James Bennett says:

    $20 BILLION a year, of our money spent on ‘the war on drugs’, a war that is impossible to win.

    Yet the disclaimer for legal perscribed pharm. could scare you to…death.

    We could do a lot with $20. billion a year.

    Stuff more worthwhile that feeding the corporate prison machine.

    Thumb up 15 Thumb down 6

  8. Phil Maher says:

    This is not an issue I really care about, but I do want to point out on thing from the article that resonates to me: For a city that’s proposing construction of a $2.4 mil roundabout under at least the partial pretense of “reducing the carbon footprint”, a requirement that all marijuana be grown indoors, and thus requiring high-output lights, fans, filters…all consuming large amounts of electricity, seems to fly in the face of the council’s stated objectives. A carbon footprint is a carbon footprint. How you leave it is secondary to leaving it in the first place.

    Thumb up 17 Thumb down 0

  9. Total Joke says:

    The whole medical MJ thing is a joke. When high school kids are getting prescriptions for chronic pain we have sunken to a new low. Mostly drug users and dealers hiding behind a “medical” need that the voters were dumb enough to vote for. Cities can’t clean up the mess that the voters created.

    Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2

  10. The Hammer says:

    The city has a rule, the county has a rule, the state has a rule and finally, the feds have a rule. Amazing.

    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1

  11. brad says:

    Ya know folks, we just can’t have enough “medical” marijuana. There are lots addicts out there that must have their dope.

    Thumb up 15 Thumb down 7

Leave a Reply