Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Cotati City Council warms to county power agency

By JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Sonoma County officials appear close to enlisting another city into the fold of its clean power agency — albeit one of the smaller ones.

The Cotati City Council on Wednesday expressed some concerns about voting procedures on the proposed agency board, issues that county officials promised to address.

But overall, council members voiced support for an enterprise meant to displace PG&E as the county’s chief source of electricity and offer a greener energy portfolio, with sources including solar, wind, geothermal and small hydroelectric projects.

power linesThe city’s concerns centered primarily on language in the joint powers agreement that will govern operations of the county power program. That language allows the agreement it to be amended by a two-thirds vote with those votes possibly coming on a weighted basis, with member agencies’ votes based on electrical use. That, said Mayor Mark Landman, means Santa Rosa and the county alone could make decisions that would impact the smaller cities without their concurrence.

“We’re hopeful they’ll be able to make some adjustments to that,” Landman said Thursday. “I wouldn’t call it a sticking point, but let’s just say it’s very important to the city and to all the small cities in this county.”

Cotati has the smallest share of the county’s PG&E energy usage at 1.3 percent, except for Healdsburg, which because it runs its own municipal energy agency has just 250 PG&E meters.

The Cotati council asked that the issue — and perhaps an ordinance to join the agency — be brought back for consideration June 26, just before the June 30 deadline the county has set for cities if they want to participate in the rollout of the power system on Jan. 1.

The county intends, at a minimum, to launch the agency for residents and business customers outside of the nine cities. So far, only Windsor has agreed to join for the launch of the agency, although other cities can join later.

Electrical customers will be able to opt out of the county program and stay with PG&E.

Cotati residents have indicated that they want both options on the table, Landman said. “The clear thing we heard from the community is they wanted the ability to be able to choose for themselves,” he said.

“If we choose to vote ‘no’ on this, they don’t have the ability make that choice,” he said. “They want an up or down vote for this.”

Second District County Supervisor David Rabbitt on Wednesday voiced reservations that he has sounded before about the speed at which the power project has progressed and whether it is ready for launch. Landman on Thursday said the council seemed satisfied.

“There’s been an incredible amount of work on this,” he said. “I think they’ve done the groundwork and they had the answers to all our questions.





4 Responses to “Cotati City Council warms to county power agency”

  1. Phil Maher says:

    I have never seen Cotati look so embarrassingly run down and shoddy in my life. This is an epic failure on the part of City Hall and all its leadership. They’ve let the town and its people down miserably. As usual, they can’t or won’t even take care of what they have presently, but they want more? Even those with a progressive bent should be outraged to the point of action, and a logical first step would be to wrest their city back from those responsible. This should be put to the citizens, not foisted on them by a city council that’s consistently demonstrated a pattern of poor, self-serving decisions resulting in a failure to deliver on even their most basic of responsibilities.

    Thumb up 13 Thumb down 5

  2. Follower says:

    Maybe we should have the IRS run our power grid.
    They’re already running our Health Care.

    idiots

    Thumb up 16 Thumb down 5

  3. Don Howard says:

    Government should stay out of business. History shows the failures of such attempts. Proceed at your peril.

    Thumb up 15 Thumb down 4

  4. James Bennett says:

    This is all soft pedal propaganda as to create an illusion of legitimate process.

    This is a done deal ’cause that’s what ICLEI has directed.

    When ICLEI says jump, our “leaders” say;
    “how high”?

    Thumb up 18 Thumb down 4

Leave a Reply