Comments on: Zoning board approves kennel expansion near Oakmont

By: Steve Johnson

Steve Johnson — Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:12:34 +0000

Neighbors? The closest property is over 3 acres. Let’s get real and stop challenging the authorities that have done their job. Bullies are just meanspirited unhappy miserable people. Get therapy? Steve Johnson Oakmont

1 1

By: Sonoma County Native

Sonoma County Native — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:38:38 +0000

This kennel is located on the north side of Highway 12, the OTHER side of the highway from Oakmont. If any Oakmonter can actually be bothered by the canine noise(if any) that is louder than the traffic noise on the corridor, they can simply dial down the volume on their hearing aid! And yes, that is sarcasm you hear…

4 1

By: Robert

Robert — Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:36:06 +0000

I drive by this location five days a week to make a delivery and have never heard one dog barking.

11 1

By: JOe

JOe — Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:43:39 +0000

complaints from residents of the retirement community that the expansion will result in more noise and traffic concerns
—

tell ‘em to stuff it… Oakmont has caused more traffic on 12 than ANY OTHER piece of property from Santa Rosa to Sonoma…

10 3

By: James Bennett

James Bennett — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:58:56 +0000

If some of you public officials are proud of your positions on WSC, why not use your real names?

What about the chronology of it? Think the neighbors would move there if they knew there was dog kennel next door?

The noise? The smell on a hot day? The traffic impact?

Tammi Bernd defines animal lover.

It’s not right, it will damage their property value, the peaceful enjoyment of their investment.

Out by the airport, a rural area without homes around.

Be proud ‘Grey’, use your real name.

1 3

By: Grapevines

Grapevines — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:45:00 +0000

Woof, woof, woof!

Arf!!!

8 1

By: Reality Check

Reality Check — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:22:30 +0000

As anyone who lives remotely close to this kennel already knows, the nonstop generator of noise in the neighborhood is from traffic on Hwy 12. It’s hard to believe many will hear any dogs above the din of fast moving cars and trucks.

18 6

By: Grey Whitmore

Grey Whitmore — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:52:59 +0000

I’m sorry, property rights?

What about Neimann’s property rights?

She is within the county code requirements! I’d say she was exercising here rights to use her land.

16 8

By: James Bennett

James Bennett — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:49:10 +0000

This is kinky insider deal against the objections of all the neighbors. It will damage their property rights, their peace, and motorist safety on Hwy 12.

This deal is far from over.

8 15