Look at the record. It endorses Democrats, whether left-wing zombies like Woolsey or more moderate candidates.

5  2

4  3

Own it!

13  7

11  6

Just look at the current Board of Supervisors. Carillo and Rabbit are conservatives, I don’t care how they are registered to vote. Zane and McGuire ride the fence. Gorin, the only one elected without PD endorsement is the only one close to being a liberal Democrat.

I know of one city council in Sonoma County with only one liberal Democrat on board. All thanks to PD spin.

4  12

7  9

We witnessed/are watching a deliberate orchestrated fascist molestation of a successful model of same.
It was deliberately crashed.

The cabal that has mixed corporate interests with our sacred Republic are the same people that our Progressive public servants are working for.

While we’re on ironic paradoxical misnomers.

These globalists DON’T CARE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT.

They care about oppression, totalitarian oppression.

Think leaders that care about the environment would spray us and the ENVIRONMENT with tons of toxic nano-particulate? Think true environmentalists would stand against it? What about being complicit in GMO?
What about the Gulf?

We’ve all been brain washed, duped beyond our current comprehension.

I don’t like labels, but, Progressives are under a spell.

I wish they’d snap out of it soon, so we can get after the business of looking after OUR well being.

You might feel at home soon, ’cause China’s comin’ here.

You’ll see what I mean soon enough.

6  9

CA politics is now a contest between so-called “moderate” Democrats and progressive Democrats. The Republicans forfeited their natural place as the alternative to the governing party through ideological absolutism and an annoying and tone-deaf political style. So, yes, the PD will endorse Democrats, because anyone who wants to play in CA politics has to do it under the Democrat label. Anyone who is actually paying attention will see that the PD consistently supports business Democrats(AKA moderate Republicans), not progressives.

6  8

3  9

Kay, council said they’d revisit the issue Tuesday only if they didn’t decide on someone. Coucil didn’t lie. And the PD wasn’t in on it… They did make a recommendation, but just didn’t have a chance to publish it since council made their decision quickly.

And it was a great pick! So get off it.

6  7

PD endorses all Democrats for the next 20 years. Conservatives, people with common sense, and the fiscally responsible need not apply.

To quote Al Pacino from Scent of a Woman, “What kind of show are you guys putting on here?”

5  9

18  10

9  1

Public safety endorsed her after she and Ernesto “reached across the aisle.” That was his gift to her, what will be her gift to him? Hans Dippel?

Are you a member of either union? Because you certainly do think that people need to “get with program” by supporting who public safety has chosen. And even you seem to know that Dippel’s the guy. Talk about “things that make you go hmmmmmm…”

It’s hard to not think that the fix is in. In this case, the lead seems to be taken by public safety union leadership, who met with *SOME* (not all) of the applicants. The word is they didn’t like Robin Swinth, apparently for not being a whole-hearted fan of public safety unions and their pensions. They let the council know that their choice was Hans Dippel.

Some say that they are the king-makers this time around (Dave Rogers sure seems to think so), it sounds like that’s how it’s heading. This is outrageous and destructive of city fairness and process. Our “business majority” on the Council seem to take their marching orders from a select few. People should plan to voice their consternation over this at the meeting.

11  19

7  11

“See who the PD is recommending and go the other way”

It’s a can’t lose proposition.

21  6

Public-Private Partnerships, Stake-holders. Government in the land aquisition business, telling us what we can do with ours.

Lots of things changed while we weren’t lookin’, huh?

18  10

22  12

28  4

25  8