Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Santa Rosa sticks to secrecy policy for council applicants

By KEVIN McCALLUM
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Three Santa Rosa residents had applied by the close of business Friday for the vacancy on the Santa Rosa City Council, but City Hall was sticking to its policy of keeping confidential all applicants’ names, position statements and related information.

Santa Rosa City Council chambers at city hall.

The city on Thursday rejected a request by The Press Democrat under the California Public Records Act seeking disclosure of the names and related records. The city cited what it called a “deliberative process exemption” to the law that allows agencies to withhold documents if “the public interest served by not disclosing the record clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the record.”

The deadline for applying for the council vacancy is 5:30 p.m. Tuesday. City Clerk Terri Griffin said that although the city does not consider the names and applications to be public records, she would make them available for review Wednesday.

The council passed the confidentiality policy on Tuesday. Mayor Scott Bartley said it would preserve the integrity of the appointment process and prevent potential applicants from getting discouraged from applying when they saw who else might be seeking the appointment.

Councilman Gary Wysocky voted in favor of the policy, but said Friday he didn’t give much thought to the confidentiality provision. “I just didn’t think it was a big point,” he said. “We’re talking a very short period of time.”

He said that in retrospect, after considering how the policy is “inconsistent” with laws governing the release of information about candidates for election, he “would probably change my vote” and support a more transparent process.

Despite the policy, word continues to leak out about who may be seeking the appointment.

Winery executive Hans Dippel, who finished eighth in the 2012 election, said his paperwork is ready to go, including nomination signatures, financial disclosures and answers to the council’s nine questions.

He said he’s seeking appointment in part to honor those who supported his campaign. He received nearly 14,000 votes.

“If I were not to apply, that would be like giving up on them,” Dippel said.

Caroline Banuelos, who finished seventh in the 2012 race for four seats, said she plans to apply Tuesday.

David Rosas, president of the Roseland School Board, reportedly has been asking people for signatures as part of the application process, as has planning commissioner Curtis Byrd.

Other names that continue to come up include Board of Public Utilities member Robin Swinth, Leadership Institute for Ecology and the Economy Executive Director Tanya Narath and Omelette Express owner Don Taylor, who was the fifth-place vote-getter in November.

Others who have previously been mentioned either never intended to apply or have decided not to.

Donna Zapata, executive director of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, said she has no interest in the post. Neighborhood activist Judy Kennedy said she considered applying but opted not to because she didn’t think she could get the council’s support.

“I don’t have a chance,” she said.

(You can reach Staff Writer Kevin McCallum at 521-5207 or kevin.mccallum@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @citybeater.)





6 Responses to “Santa Rosa sticks to secrecy policy for council applicants”

  1. Caller says:

    @Terry Jensen –
    First of all, agreed.
    Second of all, how is Judy Kennedy not angry, toxic, and bitter?

  2. Q213 says:

    Funny how the press waives the freedom of information flag only when it wants to. Ravitch has been HIDING her pathetic stats for some time now and not a word about that.

  3. Caller says:

    How many articles is the PD going to write about this just a few days before all of the information is released? Must be a slow news week.

  4. brown act Jack says:

    Amazing how the press rolls over for the politicians.
    think about this, deliberative actions refers, does it not, to legislative actions, which, of course, the submission of applications and the disclosure of applications, and the hiring of the applicant do not consist of any deliberation, do they?

    But, of course,a City Attorney will do what the City Council, or the Mayor want the City Attorny to do, otherwise the CA would have to throw away the job!

    if the City will not take the advice of the CA then the CA would reasonably consider that advice is not needed and resign from the position, as advice not taken is advice that is worthless to the client!

  5. BigDogatPlay says:

    What specific public interest is the council citing to maintain confidentiality? Hiding that the council has likely already made it’s collective mind up on a particular person so as not to discourage others interested from wasting their time doesn’t really seem to ring true.

  6. Terry Jensen says:

    Judy Kennedy got it right. The people of Santa Rosa do not want any more angry, toxic and bitter people on the City Council such as Gary Wysocky, and as he likes to call himself, “the reverend Curtis Byrd.”