WatchSonoma Watch

Many choices for Santa Rosa City Council in picking 7th member


Imagine if you could win a seat on the Santa Rosa City Council without enduring an election.

No fundraising. No campaigning. No walking precincts. No groveling for endorsements from special interest groups.

Just fill out an application, answer a few questions, and if four of the six council members like what they hear, you get to join them in directing public policy for the next two years.

Santa Rosa City Council chambers at city hall.

That possibility is proving attractive to 17 people who hope to be appointed to serve the remaining two years of the second term of Susan Gorin, who won election to the Board of Supervisors in November.

While several applicants have run unsuccessfully for council, most have demonstrated little if any political aspirations before now.

“I cannot imagine myself campaigning, raising money and doing all the other things that would be required to be elected,” admitted Roy Sprague, a retired Cal Fire firefighter who has lived in the city 23 years.

Sprague suggests that not standing for election makes him a better choice because he will not be beholden to special interest groups.

“To get elected, you have to do some things that obligate you to people, so my strength right now is that I’m not obligated to anybody,” Sprague said. “I will be guided only by what is best for the citizens of Santa Rosa.”

Jeffrey Owen also acknowledges that he has “never had an interest to run in an election.” But the executive at Exchange Bank said he “saw this as an opportunity to provide community service where I believe I can contribute to the betterment of Santa Rosa.”

Unemployed lumber salesman Douglas Krikac offers a similar assessment. “This position intrigues me,” Krikac wrote in his application. “I doubt that I could be elected to the office, so want to give appointment a try.”

The comments underscore a key challenge facing the council as it seeks to fill the vacant seat.

Should it select someone who has never shown an interest in running for public office, and if so how can that be justified? Why should it give the job to someone unwilling to ask voters for it?

Or should the council tap one of those who has stood for election, albeit unsuccessfully? Shouldn’t their willingness to seek election and the support they received count for something?

Applicants like Don Taylor, Caroline Banuelos, Hans Dippel and Mike Cook, all of whom were on the ballot in November but were not elected, argue that their prior campaigns demonstrate their desire to serve.

Even Cook, who dropped out of the race, claims his aborted campaign “proves that I am a dedicated resident.”

There is value, they and others argue, in candidates who have subjected themselves to the rigors of a political campaign. It forces them to get to know their constituents, understand their concerns and gain at least a familiarity with the policy issues facing the city.

“I knocked on doors for a year,” wrote Hans Dippel, a wine industry executive who finished eighth in the November race that put the top four vote-getters in office.

There is a sense among some that the council, since it decided to open the process to all residents, is looking for someone voters haven’t seen before, Dippel said.

“The feeling is they are probably not going to appoint somebody who has previously run, which makes no sense to me,” Dippel said.

Mayor Scott Bartley has made it clear he wanted as large and diverse a group of candidate as possible, and said the council’s job isn’t to “pick the most popular person,” but rather whomever “can do the best job.”

Some people with a direct stake in the decision are making it known that they think the campaign experience of some applicants should be viewed as an asset, not a liability.

“I feel that if you’ve run, you’ve already shown your commitment to an extent,” said Alan Schellerup, president of the Santa Rosa Police Officers Association.

Schellerup was one three public employee union representatives who interviewed council applicant Robin Swinth, a member of the city Board of Public Utilities member who is considered one of the frontrunners, and Tanya Narath, the executive director of the Leadership Institute for Ecology and the Economy, who opted not to apply soon after her meeting with the groups, citing the workload.

Schellerup argues that those who were unsuccessful in November nonetheless secured significant support, noting that Dippel received nearly 14,000 votes.

“That’s 14,000 more than Robin or Tanya,” Schellerup said.

The diversity of backgrounds and talents of those stepping forward for the first time are apparent.

They include former Agilent engineers, a banker, a tutor, a community relations specialist, a water quality regulator, a pharmaceutical salesman and several small business owners and retirees.

While 17 applicants may seem like plenty to choose from, Dave McCuan, political science professor at Sonoma State University, said the field “thins pretty quickly.”

He noted that 75-year-old retired nurse Karen Lovvorn’s preference not to attend night meetings makes her an unlikely selection.

Others who might find trouble garnering four votes include: Bob Malm, a retired container ship captain who provided two- and three-word answers on the council questionnaire; Krikac, who says he is running to represent “all the other regular guys and gals,” but says he has little hope of being selected; and Zachary Rounds, a water quality regulator with the state Department of Public Health, who submitted some unusual qualifications (“I can also run a mile in around seven minutes, which will be useful when rival cities challenge us to a foot race for the prize of renegotiated water rights”).

If those who have run for the office and failed to win and those who can be considered “second-tier” applicants are set aside, McCuan said the field shrinks quickly.

“We might have five or six candidates who are really viable, and I would cut that number in half,” McCuan said.

The council probably will gravitate toward someone who hasn’t run for office but has a significant record of public service, such as being a member of a city board or commission, McCuan said.

“In some senses, this is worse than reality television, because they are trying to appoint someone who will be a key decision maker but is also a blank slate,” McCuan said.

Finding the right person will be a big challenge, especially given the process to date, which McCuan called “poorly handled and bizarre” for the secrecy surrounding it.

The ultimate decision will be “supercharged and second-guessed” by everyone because the influence of that seventh council member could be enormous, McCuan said.

“The future direction of the council hangs in the balance,” he said.

A special City Council meeting to interview candidates begins at 2 p.m. Monday at City Hall. Public comments begin at 2 p.m., with interviews scheduled to begin at 2:30 p.m. They are scheduled in 15-minute intervals through 7 p.m. The council can make a decision Monday evening or on Tuesday before its regular council meeting.

Who are the 17 applicants for the Santa Rosa City Council?

(See photo of the applicants)

Name: Don Taylor

Age: 53

Profession: Owner of Omelette Express

Lives: West Santa Rosa

Party: Republican

Issues: Polarization of council, budget

Noteworthy: Active in Sister Cities of Santa Rosa, has run unsuccessfully for council four times.

Name: Caroline Bañuelos

Age: 53

Profession: Former homeless services provider, current grade school tutor

Lives in: Rincon Valley

Party: Democrat

Issues: Rebuilding the economy, retraining workers

Noteworthy: Current planning commissioner, came in sixth in 2012 council race

Name: Mike Cook

Age: 33

Profession: Co-owner Santa Rosa landscape architecture firm

Lives in: Northwest Santa Rosa

Party: Democrat

Issues: Improving the economy, bringing council together

Noteworthy: Active in Santa Rosa Chamber. Served on Design Review Board. Pulled out of 2012 council race, came in 7th

Name: Hans Dippel

Age: 52

Profession: Sales and marketing executive at wine industry services firm

Lives in: Fountaingrove

Party: Democrat

Issues: Economic revitalization, pension reform

Noteworthy: Came in 8th in 2012 council race. Also was on ballot in 2008.

Name: Curtis Byrd

Age: 57

Profession: Community relations specialist for Blood Centers of the Pacific

Party: Democrat

Lives in: Northwest Santa Rosa

Issues: New ideas to boost economy, building community

Noteworthy: Planning commissioner, divinity student

Name: David Rosas

Age: 50

Profession: Telecommunications software analyst

Lives in: Roseland

Party: Democrat

Issues: Replacing redevelopment dollars, increasing tax revenues with new business.

Noteworthy: Community activist who ran for council in 2008.

Name: Robin Swinth

Age: 45

Profession: Former Agilent engineer

Lives in: Bennett Valley

Party: Democrat

Issues: Creating sustainable budget, maintaining city services

Noteworthy: Member of the city’s Board of Public Utilities, mother of two

Name: George Steffensen

Age: 55

Profession: Retired union official.

Lives in: Montgomery Village

Party: Democrat

Issues: Sustainable budget, retaining and attracting businesses

Noteworthy: Former member of the Cotati-Rohnert Park School Board.

Name: Roy Sprague

Age: 69

Profession: Retired firefighter

Lives in: West Santa Rosa

Party: Republican

Issues: Traffic and pedestrian safety, county islands

Noteworthy: Cal Fire Battalion Chief in Glen Ellen for 17 years, served on 2010-2011 Sonoma County Grand Jury.

Name: Gary Saal

Age: 61

Profession: Owner of an intellectual property licensing firm.

Lives in: Fountaingrove

Party: Republican

Issues: Economic development, jobs

Noteworthy: Former trustee of the Mark West Unified School District board; working to bring a minor league baseball team to city

Name: Zachary Rounds

Age: 34

Profession: Water quality regulator with the state Department of Public Health

Lives in: Bennett Valley

Party: Libertarian

Issues: Urban blight, maintaining infrastructure, competition for water resources

Noteworthy: He is the youngest applicant for the vacancy.

Name: Jeffrey Owen

Age: 48

Profession: Exchange Bank Special Assets Department, managing distressed properties

Lives in: Montecito Heights

Party: Republican

Issues: Budget, ability to meet residents’ expectations

Noteworthy: Father of four, avid cyclist. Commissioner on the county’s Open Space District.

Name: Karen Lovvorn

Age: 75

Profession: Retired nurse and diabetes educator.

Neighborhood: Northwest

Party: Democrat

Issues: Job creation, gang prevention

Noteworthy: Oldest applicant for the position

Name: Douglas Krikac

Age: 61

Profession: Unemployed lumber salesman

Party: Republican

Lives in: Bennett Valley

Issues: Homelessness, budget

Noteworthy: Calls himself a “regular guy, willing to represent all the other regular guys and gals.”

Name: Robert Malm

Age: 72

Profession: Retired container ship captain

Lives in: Bennett Valley

Party: Green

Issues: Education, budget

Noteworthy: Served on the Sonoma County Grand Jury, gave shortest answers to council questions.

Name: Barbara Ramsey

Age: 68

Profession: Past president and Sonoma County Medical Association Alliance and Foundation.

Lives in: Oakmont

Party: Democrat

Balance budget/pension reform; environmentally sustainable economic growth

Noteworthy: Member of the city’s Community Advisory Board since 2008.

Name: P.W. Griffiths Hughes

Age: 61

Profession: Pharmaceutical salesman for Pfizer

Lives in: Bennett Valley

Party: Republican

Issues: Pension reform, health care

Noteworthy: Soccer coach, active in Southeast Greenway campaign


Monday interview times for the 17 applicants for the council vacancy are:

2:30 p.m. Curtis Byrd
2:45 p.m. David Rosas
3 p.m. Douglas Krikac
3:15p.m. Mike Cook
3:30 p.m. George Steffensen
3:45 p.m. Barbara Ramsey
4 p.m. Roy Sprague
4:15 p.m. Gary Saal
4:30 p.m. Robin Swinth
4:45 p.m. Don Taylor
5 p.m. P.W. Hughes

5:15 p.m. — Council 30-minute dinner break

5:45 p.m. Hans Dippel
6 p.m. Karen Lovvorn
6:15 p.m. Zachary Rounds
6:30 p.m. Jeffrey Owen
6:45 p.m. Caroline Bañuelos
7 p.m. Robert Malm

(You can reach Staff Writer Kevin McCallum at 521-5207 or kevin.mccallum@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @citybeater)

5 Responses to “Many choices for Santa Rosa City Council in picking 7th member”

  1. Kay Tokerud says:

    Yes Laura, the fix was in but for Robin Swinthe. I heard the rumor about a week and a half ago. Apparently there was at least one or more serial meetings which would be Brown Act violations.

    We now have a progressive majority! The moderates gave away the store. Notice that they had a Special Meeting instead of a regular meeting, I didn’t notice any public comments and they faked that they would be deciding on Tuesday, today, when people could have weighed in. This process was a big slap in the face to the voters.

    How do I know she’s a progressive. All through her interview she used the common catch words of Sustainable Development (UN Agenda 21).

    Watch the progressive agenda being advanced in earnest now. The last two years have been somewhat of a breather but now we’re screwed again. Wysocky and Carlstrom will be in the driver’s seat. Time to regroup and resist.

    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 11

  2. Laura Gonzalez says:

    It’s hard to not think that the fix is in. In this case, the lead seems to be taken by public safety union leadership, who met with *SOME* of the applicants. The word is they didn’t like Robin Swinth, apparently for not being a whole-hearted fan of public safety unions and their pensions. They let the council know that their choice was Hans Dippel. Some say that they are the king-makers this time around, it sounds like that’s how it’s heading. This is outrageous and destructive of city fairness and process. Our “business majority” on the Council seem to take their marching orders from a select few. People should plan to voice their consternation over this at the meeting.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 18

  3. Dave Rogers says:

    Councilman Dippel’s Vision:


    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 13

  4. Dave Rogers says:

    How about Hans Dippel. Wysocky likes him and Police and Fire and Business are all behind him. He smokes cigars and is friends with local legend Guy Fieri and goes to all the meetings. Regardless of experience relationships matter and anyone who can bring all these groups together should be the Man.

    He will be guided by them on how to fix the pension issue and how to help bring more big business to Santa Rosa. He can bring a local celebrity in to help bring attention to the City.

    The Press Democrat, the City Public Safety Unions and respected Business can all pull this one out for Hans! The Unions, Business and an endorsement from The Press Democrat can help in getting him appointed.

    Everyone should get a chance to smoke a cigar with Hans and see how smart he is. He really cares about street lights.

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 16

  5. Vinyl Rules says:

    A libertarian who works for the Department of Public Health? Ha! The hypocrisy is boundless!

    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 7

Leave a Reply