Comments on: Sonoma County Board of Supervisors approve controversial 10,000-case winery

By: Brown act Jack

Brown act Jack — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:39:48 +0000

Where are they going to get the water?

4 2

By: Logical1

Logical1 — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 02:58:15 +0000

Congratulations to this entrepreneur. My best wishes for his success. Good bye NIMBY’s.

5 2

By: Snarky

Snarky — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 07:23:01 +0000

You probably all know my position.

Its NONE of the local government’s business whether a company wants to expand its operation or not so long as the company complies with the existing codes.

An expansion of a company means jobs.

But you see, the arrogant attitudes of government loafers insist on pretending their importance … even though they couldn’t run a hot dog stand on their own. They literally could not.

12 4

By: James Bennett

James Bennett — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 04:05:29 +0000

Yeah, make it look like you’re being even handed with your master.

Wouldn’t want folks to get the wrong idea.

Well, afterall…IT IS WINE COUNTRY.

13 1

By: elephant

elephant — Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:42:40 +0000

This is just like two years ago when the enormously controversial Dutra asphalt plant and the Roblar Road Quarry projects were approved by the Board of Stupidvisors right before new members arrived. Of course now they need to do this NOW because Valerie Brown is obviously for the project and Susan Gorin probably isn’t.

11 6