Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Santa Rosa neighborhood newsletter runs afoul of city

By KEVIN McCALLUM

THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Santa Rosa recently declined to pay for the printing of a neighborhood newsletter that named council members who voted in favor of allowing the BoDean asphalt plant to expand.

The city for more than a decade has paid for the printing of the West End Neighborhood News as part of its effort to support community organizations.

Bodean Company plant operator Anthony Boyle runs the batch plant from the control room on Monday, April 23, 2012. (Christopher Chung / PD)

But the November edition of the four-page newsletter contained a blurb that raised a red flag for city officials.

A short item entitled “Santa Rosa City Council Sides with BoDean Asphalt Plant” noted that the council Nov. 6 overruled the Design Review Board’s rejection of BoDean’s plans to build three 82-foot-high storage silos on the Maxwell Drive property.

The item named the four council members who voted to approve the $1.5 million project over the objections of some neighbors: Mayor Ernesto Olivares, Vice Mayor John Sawyer, Scott Bartley and Jake Ours.

It also encouraged people interested in learning more to visit two websites. One is run by Citizens for Safe Neighborhoods, a group that is suing to overturn the city’s approval of the project. The other is a related Facebook page called Parents Concerned About the BoDean Asphalt Plant.

The piece was written by Lea Barron-Thomas, president of the West End Neighborhood Association, who strongly opposes the project.

Assistant City Manager Jennifer Phillips, responsible for the city’s interaction with neighborhood groups, spotted the item and literally stopped the presses. She decided the city should not fund the newsletter unless the article about BoDean was removed, said Allen Thomas, Barron-Thomas’ husband.

The group decided to pay for the $120 printing itself and distributed 650 copies of the newsletter as planned, Thomas said.

But the decision peeved Thomas, who called the article factual and the city’s decision “very selective and unprofessional.”

The newsletter has in the past written about council members attending neighborhood events without any objection from the city, he said. Knowing the newsletter needed to remain politically neutral to retain its city funding, it has shied away from covering council votes, he said.

“So it’s not completely surprising that they had a little bit of issue with it, but I don’t think we were breaking any rules,” Thomas said.

City Attorney Caroline Fowler explained in an email to Thomas that state campaign finance rules prohibit public agencies from funding “mailings” referencing elected officials. A mailing is defined as the distribution of more than 200 copies in a calendar month.

The city previously has been warned about the rule by the state Fair Political Practices Commission, and it risked a fine if a complaint was filed over the West End newsletter, she wrote.

“The thought behind the regulations is that no one elected official should receive additional recognition or publicity using public funds,” Fowler wrote.

She said she will write guidelines to help all neighborhood groups that receive the funding understand the restrictions.

Allen said would not be surprised if his involvement with the group suing the city over the BoDean approval is motivating the closer scrutiny of the newsletter. But he said he expects future newsletters will comply with whatever rules the city drafts and the funding can return.

“We’re not looking to cause a fight with the city,” he said.

You can reach Staff Writer Kevin McCallum at 521-5207 or kevin.mccallum@pressdemocrat.com. OnTwitter @citybeater





5 Responses to “Santa Rosa neighborhood newsletter runs afoul of city”

  1. Mac E. Velli says:

    Well, in case you were wondering, the city censors those little ‘community’ newsletters. Yep, you toe the line or you get the boot.

    Not only does the city try to develop neighborhood associations itself and work with outside groups (like the Leadership Institute of Ecology and Economy) to craft ‘consensus’ by installing neighborhood ‘leaders,’ but they also restrict what gets said.

    Wake up, Santa Rosa. If you leave a vacuum you’ll get sucked up by someone.

    Mac E. Velli signing off–Enjoy the show!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  2. MendoTech says:

    Totally agree with the previous responders.

    Why is the West End Neighborhood News funded by the city in the first place? How does the city justify spending taxpayer money to fund activities of what is obviously a political action group?

    Then add the fact that the city is now using that funding to control what is published. Seems like a severe misuse of the city’s funds and power.

    How much will it cost the city to defend the lawsuits resulting from this illegal use of their political and financial power? Probably way more than the cost of filling potholes or running some street lights!

    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1

  3. Reality Check says:

    The city would better support neighborhoods by spending the money on basic infrastructure maintenance, especially filling a few of SR’s many potholes.

    Thumb up 13 Thumb down 1

  4. Dan Drummond says:

    Kind of surprised to hear we have the money to pay neighborhood groups to publish their newsletters. The next time I hear some advocate of a new tax say, “it’s only 30 cents a day,” I think I’ll remind him where that 30 cents is going.

    Thumb up 19 Thumb down 1

  5. Terry says:

    In these tough economic times where hundreds of city employees have been laid off and furloughs being required, I find it strange that the city of Santa Rosa funds these so called Neighborhood Association newsletters.

    From what I’ve seen, the author of this article is a political activist and uses her and her husband’s position to further their political agendas.

    This is just not right

    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2

Leave a Reply