Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Petaluma set to cut builders’ fees

By LORI A. CARTER

THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

After more than a year of examination and recalculation, Petaluma is poised to significantly reduce its development fees, a move seen by some as a way to rehab the city’s image as anti-business.

Four years ago, the city dramatically increased its development impact fee structure with the adoption of a new General Plan, which created some of the highest fees in the county for those wanting to build new housing or commercial buildings.

Since then, little development has occurred in Petaluma. Now city staff, Chamber of Commerce representatives and some city leaders have urged the City Council to reduce the fees to potentially capture lost opportunities.

The council informally adopted a new fee structure last month and today are expected to formally pass several new ordinances to formalize the new rules.

Currently developers pay nearly $60,000 for each single-family dwelling built, with an additional $9,000 per home for major subdivisions. That fee ranks just above Novato’s $59,100 and well above Windsor’s $46,900. Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park charge $38,300, and San Rafael’s fee is $33,700, according to Petaluma planners.

Today’s likely action will lower the fees for a single-family dwelling by about 28 percent. The new fee will be about $43,000, putting Petaluma in the middle of Sonoma County cities.

For retail buildings of 50,000 square feet or less, Petaluma now requires about $1.5 million in various impact fees, and about the same for office uses larger than 50,000 square feet.

Those fees put Petaluma at the top of what comparable cities charge, which some say create a competitive disadvantage.

Development impact fees pay for affordable housing; public art; parks and open space acquisition; the building of community centers, libraries, police and fire stations; and traffic, water and wastewater infrastructure. They are meant to offset the impacts of new residents and development on a city’s services and infrastructure.

Bill Sumski, a partner in PB&J Acquisitions, whose tenants include Camelback, Athleta, Calix and other large commercial properties in Petaluma, applauded the reductions as good for business.

“We’re heading in the right direction,” he said. “It is something that will be looked favorably upon … It’s a good start.”

He said not all tenants will pay more to be in Petaluma.

“It’s a lifestyle choice to be here,” he said. “But of course it’s all about economics.”

Today’s actions also will reduce traffic and transportation-related impact fees by about 7.5 percent. Removing two road projects from the wish-list eliminated the need to collect as much.

And because of reduced demand forecasts, water-hookup fees will go down by 72 percent and wastewater connection fees will be lowered by 18 percent.

Local business representatives since last year have urged the council to reduce the fees after hearing complaints from businesses hoping to relocate or expand in Petaluma but haven’t because of the fees.

“The current impact fees — which are by far the highest of any city in Sonoma County — serve to discourage the development our community has determined that it wants to encourage,” chamber CEO Onita Pellegrini told council members.

The council meets at 6 p.m. today at 11 English St.

You can reach Staff Writer Lori A. Carter at 762-7297 or lori.carter@pressdemocrat.com.





4 Responses to “Petaluma set to cut builders’ fees”

  1. Well Said says:

    Well said Over Easy. Torliatt and her bunch created one heck of a mess. Glass is trying to carry on for her but he is just not capable so he sounds lost.

    Davies, Herries, and Rene are trying to keep the No Growth at all cost mentality alive with their run for council and (God forbid) it sounds like Torliatt wants to come back.

    Vote carefully people. These people have nearly bankrupted and ruined Petaluma. This group of “no’s” aligned with the Paul Francis and Matt Macquires of the world will have us all getting around by ox cart pretty soon.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  2. R.B. Fish says:

    The fees collected by local cities are contribute greatly to the pension funds for staff, planners, etc. It’s beyond outrageous that a person who wants to build their dream house is charged $60K from the city who is not responsible or liable for anything. Additionally there are architectural,engineering, consultant fees, school fees,insurance and more. It’s over $100K before you start to dig. Then you have contractors who change order you for big additional cash once you start.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 5

  3. Follower says:

    The death of “Redevelopment Funding” gives birth to sanity in Builder’s fees.

    Now if we could just get the Government OUT of Health Care!

    Oh, wait… that’s right, we’re doing just the opposite!

    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2

  4. Over Easy says:

    Petaluma has put itself in this position and will suffer the consequence. The problem is the elected officials who did this damage are mostly gone and now the citizens of Petaluma will feel the hurt for a long time coming.

    Local developers all have a NO Petaluma! mentality now and it will take a WHOLE lot more than fee reduction to get them back.

    Think twice before you vote or enjoy the potholes.

    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 3

Leave a Reply