Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

PUC: PG&E ‘knew of deceit in SmartMeter snooping

By STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS

A state investigation says a former PG&E employee who used a false name to try to spy on activists in Sebastopol and elsewhere opposed to SmartMeters did not act

An example of a PG&E SmartMeter. (PD FILE)

alone but had support from senior managers.

William Devereaux resigned in November 2010 after admitting he used the name “Ralph” to try to infiltrate a Sebastopol-based online group of consumers opposed to PG&E’s digital meters.

At the time, PG&E characterized him as a rogue employee who acted on his own. Devereaux was the senior director of PG&E’s SmartMeter program from October 2009 through early November 2010.

A lengthy investigation by the state Public Utilities Commission revealed Devereaux forwarded emails he collected using the false identity to his boss and other senior managers at PG&E, including a member of the legal department.

“PG&E senior management knew of Mr. Devereaux’s deceit before it was reported in the press and failed to prevent and stop his inappropriate behavior,” said the eight-page finding from the PUC, released Wednesday.

“By lying to and infiltrating anti-smart meter consumer groups, Mr. Devereaux, acting on behalf of PG&E, violated PG&E’s obligation to provide just and reasonable service to its customers,” the finding said.

The names of senior managers involved were not revealed.

The PUC investigation now enters the “penalty phase,” where regulators will determine what, if any, fines PG&E should pay.

“It confirms what we believed all along,” said Sandi Maurer of Sebastopol, founder of the activist group EMF Safety Network. “That Devereaux didn’t act alone. His supervisors and senior executives knew what he was doing.”

Maurer met Devereaux at a forum in Sebastopol in April 2010. Then in November 2010, Maurer, the moderator of an online forum for anti-SmartMeter activists statewide, received an email from “Ralph,” who said he lived in Oakland, asking to join the forum and help with group activities.

But Maurer knew it was a hoax because Devereaux’s name was listed alongside his email address.

Activists suspect Devereaux used the same email address on Sept. 18, 2010, to join an online forum called SmartWarriorMarin and leave a critical comment. The note read: “The hypocrisy of your own arguments as you pick and chose (sic) yourself about the science regarding rf, make unsubstantiated claims about smart meter energy use, and make completely irresponsible allegations trying to link smart meters to the tragedy of San Bruno.”

“RF” refers to radio frequencies, which some people fear can heighten the risk for such medical ailments as cancer at certain exposure levels, such as those emitted by SmartMeters. A variety of scientific studies have found no such link.

The reference to San Bruno is to a PG&E natural gas line that ruptured Sept. 9, 2010, with the ensuing explosion and fire killing eight people and destroying 38 homes.

Activists suspect Devereaux also gained advance knowledge of an Oct. 28, 2010, protest at Wellington Energy in Rohnert Park, which they said would explain why the facility was deserted when protesters showed up that morning. The company provided crews to install the new meters.

PG&E says it will continue to fully cooperate with the PUC’s investigation.

PG&E previously did its own investigation that revealed others were aware of Devereaux’s surveillance activity but did not realize he was using an alias.

“This former employee’s activity was not in keeping with PG&E’s values,” PG&E spokesman Greg Snapper said Wednesday.

“Since then we have developed training for our employees about the professional use of social media. Our expectation and clear message to employees is that they participate in social media and online activities with integrity and respect and are transparent about their work with PG&E.”

Devereaux was unavailable for comment.

This story was compiled from reports by Press Democrat news staff and the San Jose Mercury News.





5 Responses to “PUC: PG&E ‘knew of deceit in SmartMeter snooping”

  1. Jim Bennett says:

    Hey Ted, why did this PG&E story go away?

    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1

  2. John Q. Public says:

    I guess this busts the bubble that PG&E has the anwser to our energy future. First, they blow up San Bruno with a pipeline explosion killing 8 people.

    Then they send this nitwit out to infiltrate a little group of dissidents in Sebastopol who rightly question their smart meters. Then like in a movie, they disavow sending him on his adventure or knowing anything about his assignment.

    Next time I think I will take two water bottles from their ecology friendly stall at the county fair. They sure aren’t giving anything else away and we are paying a very high price for the water bottles too.

    It’s too bad this unregulated utility is allowed to charge outrageous prices for gas and electricity and at the same time cozily in bed with the state legislature and state regulatory agencies.

    Another fine example of California gold!

    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 3

  3. Steve Klausner says:

    Is this a contest between dumb and dumber?

    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0

  4. Jim Bennett says:

    BTW; May 1st is the deadline for the PG&E ‘Opt Out Program’ forced by the enormous citizen outcry/bad PR.

    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0

  5. Jim Bennett says:

    The masks are falling, we’ll be seeing a lot of that this year.

    PG&E is ‘one of them’.

    PG&E was present at the Rio Earth Summit in ’92 as a ‘Stake Holder’, a ‘Public Private’ partner in the crime that is
    UN Agenda 21. Bush Sr. took the liberty (literally) of ‘signing us up’.
    It was ‘soft law’, so this history changing day didn’t require congressional OK.

    They are a central player in their complete plan for complete control;
    UN Agenda 21.
    The Smart Meters are instrumental in the implementation of the ‘Smart Grid’.

    There’s so much to say on this subject.
    All of their significant moves always seem to serve more than one purpose.
    Smart Meters:
    1) Control
    2) Surveillance
    3) EMF damage

    Enough for now, I have to get back to work so I can afford to be a good rate payer, serf, victim, whatever we are these days.

    Here’s some info.:
    http://www.freedomadvocates.org/video/watch/138_jerry_day_explains_why_smart_meters_are_bad/

    If it’s got ‘Smart’ in the name, you don’t want it.

    Unless you like those ‘lil cars.

    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 3

Leave a Reply