Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Ratings agencies downgrade redevelopment bonds

By JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Bonds issued by California’s now-defunct redevelopment agencies have been downgraded or placed on a warning list.

The move follows the state’s elimination of redevelopment agencies and legal requirements that the agencies continue to pay their outstanding debts.

The actions by the three ratings agencies — Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poors — reflect uncertainty about how that process will be managed.

“Fitch remains concerned that while the intent of the legislation is to uphold payments under bond indentures, the legislation’s language is vague,” Fitch Ratings said in a statement.

The company’s most recently reviewed redevelopment bonds include $14.5 million in A-rated bonds issued by Rohnert Park in 1999. Fitch placed them on a negative ratings watch, meaning they could be downgraded within six months.

The move is likely to affect people or institutions that bought the bonds as investments and want to trade them on the open market, not cities and counties whose redevelopment agencies issued them, experts said.

“The owners of the bonds with lower ratings will see a reduction in the price of those securities if they wish to sell them on the secondary market, because of the higher risk,” said Jim Kennedy, interim executive director of the California Redevelopment Association.

Gabe Gonzalez, the Rohnert Park city manager, said, “We keep a watchful eye on it, but it’s not a particular concern to us.”





3 Responses to “Ratings agencies downgrade redevelopment bonds”

  1. bear says:

    This is what you folks wanted?

    Congrats! Republicans will lead us into a wonderful future?

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 10

  2. Follower says:

    “legislation’s language is vague”

    That’s CLASSIC!
    ALL “spending” legislation is vague.

    How can you run a “bait & switch” on the tax payers (SMART) if you so clearly spell out the “bait” that you have no wiggle room for the “switch”??!

    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2

  3. brown act jack says:

    Now it hits the fan. Previously the CC was shielded by the RDA, but now with the RDA gone, and the bonds downgraded, you might find the bond holders going after the city for not properly disclosing the risk , or handling the proceeds of the taxes properly!

    Seems to me San Diego City Council got into big trouble by not properly reviewing the financial status of the programs when they advertised for the bond sales.
    They failed the diduciary duties of the CC by over estimating the financial status of the RDA in question.

    I can not remember the case exactly, but it makes no difference. They will either come after the CC or they won’t.

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2

Leave a Reply