Quantcast
 
Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Supes OK fresh-water lagoon at Jenner for steelhead

By BOB NORBERG
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

The benefits of creating a fresh-water lagoon in the Russian River at Jenner for the survival of juvenile steelhead outweigh the negatives, such as the possibility of worsening water quality, Sonoma County officials decided Tuesday.

The Board of Supervisors, which faced a violation of the federal Endangered Species Act if it did not take action, approved the final environmental report on the Sonoma County Water Agency’s project.

“The urgency is high that we do this today,” even though the board would have preferred the discretion to do more research, Supervisor Shirlee Zane said. “But the benefits outweigh the effects of this project.”

The water agency has been ordered by the National Marine Fisheries Service to manage the Russian River at Jenner to create a fresh-water lagoon during the summer to allow juvenile steelhead, a threatened species, to acclimate before going out to sea.

To meet the order, the water agency has developed a method to let the water back up behind the sand bar when the mouth of river is closed.

Instead of digging a ditch to the ocean to let the river out, the water agency lets the water rise to a depth that is just below flooding low-lying buildings in Jenner and then digs a broad, shallow northwesterly outlet to the sea.

That creates a lagoon that is more fresh water than salt water for a longer period of time for the steelhead.

Studies on similar California estuaries, such as Carmel River, Scott Creek and the Pescadero Marsh, indicate there are substantial benefits of a fresh-water lagoon for steelhead, according to federal biologists.

The federal agency also has ordered the water agency to lower flows in the Russian River to protect chinook, which are also threatened, and to create habitat in Dry Creek for coho salmon, which are endangered.

“It is a moral imperative,” said Dick Butler, a regional supervisor for the National Marine Fisheries Service. “If we continue with the status quo, we will endanger the steelhead, coho and chinook salmon.”

The orders were issued in 2008 and the agency was required to begin the program at Jenner immediately. Since then, it has had to manually breach the sandbar only once, in July 2010, when river flows were not sufficient to naturally open the sand bar.

The estuary program costs $950,000 a year, mostly for the expense of studies on water quality and fish along the river from Jenner to Monte Rio.

The impact report, which cost $850,000, indicated that there are possibilities of some decrease in water quality in the lagoon as more river water is allowed to stagnate there.

With higher water in the lagoon, a tsunami could worsen flood danger, seals and sea lions could be impacted and sand could be swept south on the coast and worsen conditions for surfers as some beaches.

Russian River residents contend that the project will seriously worsen water quality, that heavy equipment will chase away the seals and sea lions that gather on the sand bar and the impacts should be studied in conjunction with the other federal orders.

“To say that there is not significant problems with lower flow on water quality is simply not true,” said Brenda Adelman of the Russian River Watershed Protection Committee. “Everybody who lives on the river has seen it and lives with it.”

Mary Anne Sobieraj of Cazadero questioned whether the studies in other watersheds apply to the Russian River.

“None of the watersheds that you studied are like the Russian River,” Sobieraj said. “They don’t have the urban influence and all are less than 10 miles long.”

Norma Jellison of Jenner said she had no confidence the project would be successful.

“There is no concern for the moral imperative for any other species, the impacts to public access, to the people who come from all over the Bay Area, the state and the world to stand on the overlook,” Jellison said.

However, Butler warned that if the board did not certify the final environmental impact report, the Sonoma County Water Agency would be out of compliance with the Endangered Species Act and subject to a federal action.

Supervisors certified the report in a 5-0 vote.

“What we are trying to do is the right thing, to protect the fisheries,” said Supervisor David Rabbitt.





5 Responses to “Supes OK fresh-water lagoon at Jenner for steelhead”

  1. Let's All Pay More says:

    Leave it to Supervisor Zany to always balance things. This time she and Board living in fear of the feds, decide to create a pond on the Russian River instead of letting the natural forces take care of water flow. Or helping water flow by opening the river when it silts up.

    How much is this going to cost? And what are the benefits, Zany? She doesn’t know nor does she care.

    Building a stagnate water pond is not going to help anything and create a foul smell. Tax dollars well spent and and another job well done! Millions down the river and more to come.

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  2. ExRPEER says:

    If you want to help mother nature let the river flush itself out or help it out by dredging or mining creating deep colder water pools further upstream away from seals and sealions. I know it’s not PC but alot less burden on tax payers and a whole lot better for the fish and the health of the river.

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1

  3. Frank says:

    first the Coho is not a native to California, as for the steelhead i think it was introduced as well?
    Second Russian River has been trying to save salmon for how long, oh since the hacthery was completed before the dam went up
    think its time to fire all these so called expert federal biologists National Marine Fisheries Service people and let nature takes its course
    oh and all you brainyacks Coho and Steelhead don’t like warm waters even in a fry state

    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 2

  4. Steveguy says:

    Excuse me, but back in the day when the lagoon needed opened, a county guy with a bulldozer went over and opened it up.

    Now we have hundreds of GOVERNMENT employees fretting over it.

    The simpler life was the same, for millions and millions less money.

    Oh well.

    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1

  5. Steve Humphrey says:

    This has to be a joke.

    “The impact report, which cost $850,000, indicated that there are possibilities of some decrease in water quality in the lagoon as more river water is allowed to stagnate there.”

    Well I’ll be. You mean if water sits idle in the sun for days on end it might stagnate? No wonder they charge so much for a brilliant deduction. I’m in the wrong business.

    And don’t worry about the 950,000 per year to study the fish from Monte Rio to Jenner. Now that we have neatly quarantined them in a tidy little pen the sea lions will take care of that study for us. What’s next, a 1.5 million study on the effects on sea lions of overeating juvenile steelhead?

    Here’s a better idea. Why don’t you just ask a fisherman along the river what’s going on. Heck, they’ll talk to you for days and not charge you a dime.
    And leave the natural flow of things alone. Nature works best that way.

    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1

Leave a Reply