WatchSonoma Watch

Windsor garbage hauler sues Rohnert Park over bidding rules


A Windsor debris removal company has sued Rohnert Park, arguing that a fee the city wants to charge companies that win a hauling contract is “tantamount to a bribe.”

Pacific Sanitation’s suit says the city requires the company that wins the contract, now out for bids, to pay $300,000 in addition to other fees.

“We operate all over and we’ve never seen any fees like this,” said Dustin Abbott, a Pacific Sanitation co-owner. “We’re asking to stop the process and get rid of those fees.”

Members of the City Council’s Waste and Recycling Committee, which oversees waste collection issues, said they were not aware that the city’s request for a proposal had such a requirement.

“I don’t know if they have asked for that kind of thing before,” said Councilwoman Pam Stafford, who is on the committee.

Other city officials, including the city attorney, did not return calls seeking comment.

The estimated revenue from hauling construction and demolition materials in Rohnert Park was $239,000 a year.

For an exclusive agreement, the city would, as the lawsuit describes, require a one-time $300,000 fee. For a non-exclusive contract, the city would require $50,000 from each hauler under contract.

But the hauling service is not mandatory, meaning that independent contractors can still take away their own debris, reducing the contract hauler’s income.

“If all the independent contractors decided to self-haul, you would never recover the money,” Abbott said.

Under that arrangement, it would take years to make up the $300,000 fee, Abbott said.

In addition, he said, it would require charging customers up to 150 percent more than normal, from $750 to $1,500 compared to $250 to $500.

“How can a company operate in that environment unless they charge outrageous rates to its customers,” Abbott said.

The contract to haul construction and demolition debris also levies a 15 percent franchise fee, but that is a routine practice.

6 Responses to “Windsor garbage hauler sues Rohnert Park over bidding rules”

  1. Karla Sofen says:

    They should probably direct their lawsuit toward the company that got the contract then, assuming that something illegal was involved and they can prove it.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. John Hudson says:

    A public entity is not included on the list of “persons” subject tp the unfair competition laws. The basic idea behind the Unfair Competition Laws is that business entities, including inidviduals, corporations, partnerships, trusts, etc. cannot gain a competitive advantage by breaking the law. In other words, there has to be an underlying violation. I am just acting what that is.

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  3. Karla Sofen says:

    They probably shoe-horned it into that “unfair practices act” category, 17200 BP. You’d know more about that than anyone else around here.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. John Hudson says:

    Unfortunately, the article does not state what legal theory these guys are hanging their hat on, e.g., violation of statute, breach of contract, tort, etc. I don’t know why what the city is doing is illegal, assuming that the city IS doing it and that it is illegal. Can an attorney who speicalizes in municipal law please enlighten us?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Steveguy says:

    Extortion, it’s what the Mob does.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  6. The Hammer says:

    They’re all criminals!

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply