Loading
WatchSonoma
WatchSonoma Watch

Supes face ‘agonizing’ decisions over cuts

By BRETT WILKISON
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

The Sheriff’s Office helicopter Henry 1, an investigative team specializing in domestic violence and sex assault cases and a probation center for girls were among a number of high-profile services Sonoma County supervisors said on Monday they would try to save this week.

In their first day of informal votes on the county’s proposed $1.2 billion budget, supervisors agreed to consider restoring $5.9 million for prominent public safety programs, as well as efforts to aid at-risk youth, veterans and the mentally ill.

If approved later this week, however, those moves would eat up all the money in special emergency and sales-tax pots set aside by county administrators for last-minute budget restorations.

The scenario raises the stakes for other threatened services set to come before the board today. It also increases the likelihood that supervisors may tap several one-time funds totaling nearly $65 million — the county’s main $35 million reserve among them — to avoid politically unpopular cuts in this third straight year of reduced county spending.

“In the past two years, we talked about doing more with less,” said board chairman Efren Carrillo, who called the cuts “agonizing.”

“Today, we find ourselves in an environment of doing less with less,” he said.

High-profile cuts before the board today include those to rural road upkeep, fire and emergency services, planning and building oversight and the elimination of $22,000 for school crossing guards. If saved, the combined development and administrative services and construction projects would add $2.8 million to the county’s ballooning restoration list.

Decisions on what remains on that list as well as a final formal vote on the budget could come Wednesday.

Supervisors are seeking to fill a $42.8 million gap in the general fund — the county’s main source of discretionary money, projected to be down 4 percent over the current year to $379 million. Under the proposed budget, the deficit would be filled almost entirely with cuts, including the elimination of 223 jobs and 63 layoffs.

Even with those moves, because of property tax declines and rising costs, the county could still face a $14.6 million general fund deficit this time next year, administrators reported Monday.

The first day of hearings included presentations by Sheriff Steve Freitas and District Attorney Jill Ravitch, both of whom declined to sign off on the 16 percent spending cuts County Administrator Veronica Ferguson proposed for their offices.

Ravitch pressed her case that the 10 percent staff reduction envisioned for her office — including four investigators, one victim advocate and four attorneys — would push prosecutor caseloads beyond their current all-time peak of more than 400 per year.

“It goes beyond what we can absorb at this point,” Ravitch said of the cuts. “All that translates to justice delayed is not justice served.”

Supervisors gave no extra ground, consenting only to consider saving three positions — an investigator, the victim advocate and an attorney — jobs already identified in the add-back list.

Supervisor Valerie Brown, the board’s lone two-term veteran, pointed to the deeper 20 percent to 25 percent cuts absorbed by non-public safety services in the current and upcoming fiscal years.

“We have protected the Sheriff and District Attorney to the maximum extent,” she told Ravitch. “I just can’t go beyond the three (jobs) on the list.”

Several speakers praised supervisors for once again trying to save the Sierra Youth Center, the probation camp for delinquent girls. The facility, which serves 15 girls at any one time, at an annual cost of $1.1 million, has been a regular on the chopping block in previous years.

Several speakers said its elimination would send more girls to uncertain futures in group homes or jail.

“It was a sanctuary for me,” said Sondra Gilbert, 26, a Guerneville resident and Sierra graduate who said she was training to be an herbalist.

“It gave me my life back.”

Other programs proposed for preservation included:

–The Sheriff’s gang unit, with partial funding of $292,000.

–A supervised release program for low-risk, pretrial offenders, at partial funding of $390,000.

–Five juvenile hall positions, overseeing programming and security, totaling $634,000.

–Two assistant positions within the Animal Care and Control division, totaling $69,000.

In an earlier informal vote on a budget supplement, supervisors also restored funding to the Sheriff’s bomb unit, code enforcement efforts and 4-H and master gardener programs.

The same vote eliminated the Human Services Commission and transferred oversight of $300,000 — about half the current annual allocation for grants to 26 community groups serving the needy — plus $80,000 in administrative dollars to the county’s Community Development Commission.

The money for those moves came from state and federal grants, unused county fees and reimbursements for government services, and from shifting funds from one county department or account to another.





10 Responses to “Supes face ‘agonizing’ decisions over cuts”

  1. bill says:

    The simple truth is the gravy train has come and gone. The outrageous increase in real estate prices fueled a government that is no longer needed or affordable. Time to get back to the good old days when the County belonged to the farmers. That is the true economy. Get used to it or leave.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  2. Allen Rafanan says:

    Tell me again, what are they cutting? The article reads more about what the county ISN’T going to cut again. We may have different cowboys, but it’s the same ‘ol rodeo.

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1

  3. Phil Maher says:

    @GAJ and Carol-

    Yes, precisely. Just on Sonoma’s share of “Phase I” of SMART, what would about $300mil do for us if it was actually being spent on something useful, necessary, and intelligent? The Emperors have no clothes when it comes to everyday needs, but they have their eye on one hell of a nice party dress.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

  4. Huh? says:

    @Dan

    Public employees and their pensions are bankrupting us?

    @Alex,

    I like your post except the stuff about public programs, that harks back too much to Ronnie and his Welfare Queen scenario.

    Who really siphons off the money? Um, how about this? http://costofwar.com/en/

    Or this? http://www.villagevoice.com/2008-09-23/columns/the-backstory-of-the-financial-collapse/

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4

  5. Alex says:

    I love how I just keep reading that the working county employees are breaking the government. All the while, billions have been spent on welfare programs and subsidized housing…but those evil working people…damn them to hell as if they are the ones breaking the government! Grow the hell up, I use to work as a public servant and can tell you, there were years we went without raises when everyone else was getting huge raises and stock options, etc. No one cared if I did or didn’t get a raise…when I went to buy my first house, the agent looked at me and asked “well, what stock options are you going to overbid with?” I looked at her like lobsters crawling out of her ears and said, “I am a public employee and haven’t had a raise in two years…what stock options?!” She chuckled at me. Now, that all the fat cats who were sitting large are now sitting in unemployment lines, they are the ones who want to whine! Too damn bad, many of these county employees gave up bonuses and raises for a pension. So now you want to take that away?…don’t be an idiot. The counties and cities knew what employee negotiation contracts they were signing; however, as usual, the political whores had their “worry about it later attitude”…well, fix the mess you got yourself into…don’t go on the backs of the “WORKING PEOPLE” and try to villainize them when the politicians with their social programs is what really drove the economy in the crapper. Simply put, adopt the budget of whatever the annual government income will be…so if have to adopt a 1993 budget to match the income then cut or adjust your pet projects…just do it. A good case point is how they threw several hundred thousands of dollars on “Humboldt Bike Boulevard”…it was going to cost over a million dollars just for some signs and rotary…this is the problem…right there…frivolous spending on every damn special interest group. Fire, Police, Roads, and Schools…everything else, CUT it! One more thing, open the books to see where are these billion of dollars going for these make-shift mobile home schools we have been putting up….no more money until you can justify every penny…no more “general fund” baloney…or “other expenses” the devil is in the details, baby…start looking.

    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 3

  6. Carol Miller says:

    @ GAJ

    Excellent comment. Too bad the boys and girls that make the decisions at the County are so invested in the SMART train money pit.

    Who needs a train to nowhere when you can’t get to a station on a dirt road full of potholes.

    Great job County Board! You shine again with your needless spending on a social program that should have never been started.

    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 3

  7. County Worker says:

    Dan,
    Even though you were not invited, the county and the local unions have been studying pension costs and options for several months. They are in agreement that changes need to be made and are working on the details. You can read about when the work is done.

    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 4

  8. Dan Delgado says:

    And still no talk of pension reform. Thanks to all those public employees out there bankrupting us.

    Thumb up 11 Thumb down 10

  9. GAJ says:

    Kill the SMART Train and immediately we have many millions back in the budget.

    Thumb up 17 Thumb down 4

  10. Carla P. says:

    So the county whines because it has to cut a few dozen jobs from the overall operation?

    Big deal. Grow up.

    I resent their whining. I resent Efren’s whining that the cuts are “agonizing.”

    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 13

Leave a Reply