 |
 |
By BOB NORBERG
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
Sonoma County transportation planners on Monday revived a proposed $10 increase in vehicle registration fees which could be used for transit, bike lanes, a school safety program or fixing potholes.
A final decision on whether to put the fee proposal on the November ballot and how the money might be spent will be made in May.
That will allow the members of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority time to get direction from their individual city councils on whether to move forward with the vote.
“It gives us direction, but it doesn’t give you direction,” Jake Mackenzie, SCTA chairman and a Rohnert Park councilman, told the transportation authority staff. “We will come back in May.”
Most of the SCTA members generally supported the idea, particularly if the spending plan was tied to programs that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
“If it is fixing potholes, I am not there,” said Valerie Brown, chairman of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors. “If it is Safe Routes to Schools, transit, bike paths … I’m there.”
Supervisor Shirlee Zane said transit is vital for those who have the quietest voices in the debate, such as seniors, the disabled, students, minorities and the poor.
“We need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is to have better transit,” Zane said.
Petaluma Councilman David Glass, however, argued for a funding formula that would allow the individual cities to have the flexibility to use some of the money as they wish, “so the person who is asked to pay this fee could see that there is some value.”
“The cost is $8,500 a year to operate a vehicle, so a $10 fee is inconsequential in the operation of a vehicle, but not in asking the voters to pay it,” Glass said.
Supervisor Paul Kelley reiterated his opposition to the fee, which will be competing in November with many other requests for taxes and fees and he believes will not be viewed favorably by voters.
“Regardless of the size, it appears to be nickeling and diming the public to death,” Kelley said.
Healdsburg Councilman Mike McGuire urged there be a survey taken of voters, at a cost of $25,000 to $30,000, before adopting a spending plan.
“It will be important that folks know what they are voting for, we need to be as detailed as possible to where the money will be spent,” McGuire said.
When the measure was debated in March, proponents cited the sharp cuts in state funding of transit, the need to improve safety of children walking to school and bike and pedestrian paths that provide alternate forms of transportation.
Opponents, however, felt the measure was being rushed to the ballot and there were questions about how the money would be spent. Others rejected it as being another tax increase in tough financial times.
The proposal failed on a 5-6 vote, with seven votes needed to pass.
A $10 increase in the fee would raise $105 million over 20 years.
In the first year, the previous proposal had allocated $3.63 million for Sonoma County, Santa Rosa, Healdsburg and Petaluma bus systems, $398,729 for the Safe Routes to Schools program and $697,775 for bicycle paths.
Legislation that was signed into law last year allows transportation authorities to go to the ballot with the registration fee requests, which only need a majority to pass.
The counties of Alameda, Marin, San Francisco, Solano and Napa have already decided to put the measure on the ballot, while Contra Costa and Santa Clara are also considering it, said SCTA Executive Director Suzanne Smith.
Subscribe by Email
Follow us on Twitter
No, no, no, no, NO! Get back to me when you’ve cut all the waste and I’ll consider it.
No more fees
Our government has shown that they can not manage money. They spend, spend, spend and then when they are out of money it is cut, cut, cut and raise taxes or fees.
Didn’t we as a state a few years back vote on a proposition to fund our public schools? Were we (the State) created a bond that we will pay back with interest for the next 20 years or so? So where did the money go? and why now are we cutting 22,000 teachers.
Didn’t we here in the North Bay approve a 1/4 percent tax increase for a rail system? Where is it? How many years is it behind schedule? And how much more is the project cost now than when it was originally proposed.
Our government has no idea how to manage a budget. They have no idea how to save – and when you propose savings, it goes to committees upon committees (at what cost).
If Government was a private business they would be Bankrupt, they provide little to no service any longer, and the service they provide terrible. People only deal with Government because they have too, not because they want to!
I will vote no on any increase in any tax or fees – simply because Government has shown no responsibility managing my money!
A flat $10 per car tax isn’t my first choice of how to pay for road repairs, but it beats the alternative, roads not being repaired.
Adding a penny or two to the gas tax would be fairer. The more one uses the roads, the more one pays. But proposing that would require political leadership and maybe is beyond what’s politically possible these days.
So, bring on the $10 “fee.”
Of course, that assumes a substantial portion of the money will be used for road repairs. If it turns out that most will be spent on “transit” (just what does that mean), bike lanes and whatnot, then forget it.
Hey I have an idea! Let’s start requiring the Residents of Healdsburg to smog their vehicles…that should generate some money. What a novel idea. Why are they exempt in the first place?
I’d be for paying $10. However, I have 4 registered driving vehicles (1 driver), and 3 other trailers, and a few ATV’s…. Is this going to cost me $40 a year or $80. I’ll tell ya right now, even at $40… my vote is NO. As for any comments, I drive less than 20k miles per year on all vehicles combined–including the vehicle I drive at/for work.